>>55375199>>55375211Sure thing
>>553732718/10
Very mixed feelings about this list. Scolopede, Pheromosa and Kleavor in the top 5, along with Slither Wing in bottom tier, truly makes ones instincts be just drop this to 2/10 and call it a day, but, ignoring those wild placements, the entire list down is not only solid, but very consistent in it's logic. We go from elegant, to sharp, to fantasy bugs, to just bug bugs, to weird bugs. The consistency really does tell a story and define it's creator, which, as much as I disagree with that story, makes me appreciate it as a list way more.
>>553734236/10
Another fairly normal take like
>>55373030, just a bit more refined to show a bit more character. Nothing is all too unique about this list; which may make some truly wild claims like Vivillon A tier slip by on first glance.
>>553734544/10
The high tiers of this one really are some oddballs that weight the list down. Mothim, Wormadam, Krikitune, Combee, Scorpi, and Durant all in the 2nd highest tier is just too much to overlook.
Although, I have to give credit. This lists clearly thinks about and individually ranks all the gimmick forms; while simultaneously deciding most of the megas and what not are just irredeemable designs. Not enough to redeem the whole list, but noteworthy.
>>553736013/10
This list is simultaneously too muddy with it's placement (what with S tier being the biggest tier), while also having some bad tastes for it's specific placements. 2/5 of the top 5 being Megas is already a bad start, but Paras and Ledyba being bottom 5 is also just as bad. Don't be fooled: you probably have one of your favorites in S tier here; but that's because just 1/3rd of the bugs are in S tier.
>>553736849/10
Got a soft spot for this list. Clearly gives respects to the fan favorites, but shows enough of it's character to differentiate itself from the masses. I would never consider Surskit a top 5 bug, but the idea is not immediately repulsive like Pheromosa.
