>>57514412>I explained how based on their design philosophy for 25+ years, that's wrongyou really didn't, quite the opposite actually
there's plenty of examples showing midriffs in all pokemon media but you just pretend it doesn't matter because it's not the main character (who also has midriff in outfits in XY and SwSh), when there's an example readily available in ZA itself as the counterpart to the female main character
I also don't think I misrepresented anything, that style is based on a real life style and I showed you pictures of it
>They likely have self-imposed guidelines specifically for the protagonist designs, with unexposed skin for the torso being one of the restrictions.ok so for picrel and other outfits they just forgor?
or do the STRICT guidelines only count for the main design?
That's not believable, either they have guidelines that prohibit this, or they don't. An internal guideline that is overlooked like this is something I don't buy and you shouldn't either.
If the guideline was imposed from the outside however, they'd be able to get away with additional outfits that haven't been checked, as is often the case with censorship in gacha titles, or games on Playstation.
The artists like midriff, this outfit style has midriff, the FMC counterpart has midriff, GF had midriff on PC in the past, who's left to consent?
and just to be clear, I don't think there necessarily has to be midriff or exposed skin on the MC, I'm just seeing an outfit that is obviously meant to have it, because that's the whole point of the roomy jeans and jacket
Again, I really think you're just taking issue with the notion that there might be outside interference, when everyone knows it happens and the economic pressures behind that system
Once again I invite you to check out the pokemon company website (the one for business) and see it for yourself, but everyone has been aware of the game rules since 2020
btw all this seething because I snipped 5cm off a shirt
wild
