>>42892398>Edgy contrarians who always vote for a bad option because they feel special and unique, and genuinely think that they are being altruistic by doing soWow, i can't believe that i share the air with people like you. Do you really believe that one has to be a "contrarian" to find the design of that penguin awful? Really now? The concept is cool, but the design is just flat out bad. That's not being a contrarian, that's just having a sense for aesthetics.
>You can regularly find them in twitter and reddit, bragging about having "btfo the norm" and "rooted for the underdog", but in truth they are just desperate for approval and social acceptance. They are the reason bad things always happen to good people.What in the fuck are you talking about? People on reddit and twitter gladly accept whatever 3rd world mcdonalds happy meal toy tier pokemon TPC gives them, just look at this shit:
https://twitter.com/jotagelimon/status/1148217120301494273The fact that you and these people gladly defend whatever lazy and awfully designed Pokemon gets released is the real problem. Reddit and twitter is the norm, they absolutely do not root for the underdog (as in this case, quality pokemon). People like you are the problem, you are the reason bad things happen with good franchises, because you somehow have shaped your identity with being a mindless consumer with absolutely no demands on getting a new product, if you just get a new pokemon the dopamine in your brain kicks in, it doesn't matter how bad it looks. Unreflecting people like you are the real problem of the world.
