>>55706347>BlueSelfish, flippant, not necessarily cruel but certainly not considerate and not really the leadership type.
>LanceWilling to get his hands dirty and leads from the front. He's strong as hell in a fair fight, but that just means he gets taken out by snipers.
>StevenRich boy who got his company through nepotism and neglects his duties in favor of hobbies. He shouldn't be in charge of anything.
>CynthiaNeeerrrd.
>AlderHe's too nice for war. When push comes to shove, he crumples like paper. He's spinless. He wouldn't have the guts to send his troops to die, which is a necessity in war.
>IrisEven moreso than Blue, she's a child with no leadership or tactical abilities. She's more like a commando or paratrooper; someone independent you send in behind enemy lines to break things.
>DianthaWhy the fuck would a movie star lead an army?
>KukuiWaste of resources. Scientists should be in the lab, not commanding troops. He'd be better heading up the poke-manhattan project or something.
>HauOut of all the literal children listed here, he's both the least intelligent and least capable of leadership.
>LeonUnironically he makes a good public figure. It would be disastrous to put him in charge of strategy, but as a figurehead (like most presidents or prime ministers) he would actually be great. He's even humble enough to recognize that he's not the smartest person in the room all the time, and is willing to admit when someone else knows better.
>GeetaOkay hear me out. We don't see a lot of her but supposedly she runs a whole school, and the pokemon league is practically a side gig. That means she's one of the few people we can say we know is versed in administration. She might actually be really good at logistics and organization.
>NemonaBasically a mix between Iris and Blue. Not someone you put in charge of anything.
>VerdictLeon might actually be the least worst option, which is a conclusion I didn't expect to come to when I started writing.
