>>58704854>Why wouldn't they be?Because it's a selling point of the new games? Trying to maintain lore accuracy is a bonus to the aesthetics, but a net negative on the experience when featured 2 new types are barely anywhere in the game. The fucking TCG handled the new typings better lmao.
>woah so like every other fucking gameI didn't need Colosseum or Battle Revolution to enjoy Emerald or Platinum, they were already good on their own.
>they're overall more effective at presenting what type of Pokemon they have an inclination of usingSo, again, bonus to aesthetics, which is all GSC has.
>lol it was so effective that people on-mass still ask for Game Freak to copy the formula of Gen 2 for a modern game.Yeah because on paper it's a great idea, reintroduce older regions as additional explorable areas. But they never bothered doing that again, and Kanto ends up making the experience feel like a worse what if instead of a genuine evolution to the franchise. It's exactly how PLA had an insane amount of improvements to the gameplay loop, and then had nearly none of them implemented or improved upon in SV, or even being made worse. As an 8 year old it was really cool to go back to Kanto, but years later on replay it ends up making Johto feel lacking due to its inclusion.
