>>46953914>Has nothing to do with Zebstrika being a clone of itexcept it's more creative, it's a zebra, not a horse, and zebras already have stripes
>You're kind of a retard if you can't spot the similaritiesthe similarities basically all rock mons possess, anon. unova isn't alone
>Woobat only existed to rip off Zubatno one wanted zubat in caves, so what do you replace it with? this is kinda sad but necessary
>Not every region has a Chansey clone>>46953878>Blue tadpole turning into angry frog. It's not rocket science.seismitoad isn't even angry but okay, they're similar. it's a simple concept to have atadpole and a toad, but it worked well. Both times.
>ambiguos creative monstersboth are humanoid, yes. that's the point. but don't say the kanot ones are more creative, or you would be a walking joke. hitmonchan is an onion man with boxing gloves that are.... a part of his body? and a graduation hat. hitmonlee is literally my mom's bobble head. either their both bad or good, no debate.
>Scolipede is essentially a Beedrill clone due to being the second generic bugmon of the region and has a secondary bug typing.Design-wise, it is not near beig a clone, loo at that beast. and being a bug does not make it a ripoff, how can you seriously hold this opinion withing calling it bait in the back of your mind?
>Voltorb had an actual reason, since it was a pokeball brought to life. The shrooms are just retarded designs.Okay, but voltord is not even close to being as original as the shrooms. the shrooms show acreature adapting to human activity. they are obviolsy pokeball referensees in both cases, but just taking a living pokeball is not anwhere near being creative
