[...]
>which you can use to basically sweep anything under and proper terms that address the specify of the issue.Holy shit, if you're calling an artpiece you don't like "not very well drawn", then I'm going to assume you'd rather want an artpiece that is the opposite of that, which is "well drawn". It's not even my "not well drawn", you fucking said that! How fucking autistic are you right now?!
>...and? What was for? "You know the water is wet, right? "I'm telling you that because you're expecting a lot form this drawthread, so don't et your hopes up, or wait for God knows how long
>>53120579>Everyone here wants things for free. Yeah but you want it in higher quality
> 'loo, this guy wants things for free, isnt it outrageous! Point and him and shoo away".It's fine to want it for free, but you have so high expectations, that I don't know when your request will be drawn. Also why do you keep putting yourself in the victim-role? I wasn't even trying to appeal to the public.
>Has nothing to do with standards, I was happy with some simple sketches delivered.So you're happy with mere sketches, but not with that first delivery because you felt the drawing wasn't "very well drawn and illustrated"?
What the fuck do you even want??
>Full-blown illustration were done here for free.Yeah, like once every few months!
>Does not mean I have to have it or will have it, *nor did I ever ask for it specifically*, but the point is still stands.Ok so you won't settle for that first delivery because it wasn't very well drawn and illustrated, but you also never asked for a higher-qualiy artwork "specifically", nor do you have to have it, or will have it.
Motherfucker, do you even know what the fuck you fucking want?
>Fallacy. You are losing the argument and you resort to pathetic ad hominemsThen tell me your side of the Tldr then. Plus it's not even ad-hominem, I just said you wanted higher quality, wtf, I said nothing about you as a person.