>>58800939 >>58800942Thanks.
>furs and skinsWhy shouldn't this be plural? He's talking about multiple different Pokemon here. There are multiple furs and skins, as well as goo and what not.
>greeted toSo apparently this is not gramatically correct. I had always read it growing up, in the context of
>greeted to the sight of ____Thanks, I guess.
>one foot tsunamiYeah, I picked that number because it's the sweet spot between "this is a problem" and "oh, the humanity!" If I may,
A one foot tsunami can't really tear down buildings, but it will move cars, damage boats and absolutely suck people out to sea if you're not out of the waters. It's a pretty major problem for a Pokemon to just create one out of nowhere, and a perfect problem for someone who isn't intimately familiar with it to just dismiss it outright.
For a tsunami to start damaging buildings, it only needs to be around three feet/one meter tall.
>You'd really think proof of pets having transformed wouldn't be THAT hard to findHow can you tell a former pet from a human who transformed and lost their faculties?
Even beyond that, there's the part where you kind of don't want people getting rid of their pets just because it /might/ be a potential infection vector. Imagine if people killed their cats and dogs during COVID thanks to WHO advice, only to find out that actually doing that didn't help them at all. The absolute shitstorm that would cause would be biblical-and is precisely what these news organizations who issued retractions are trying to avoid.
Also I needed an excuse for Dr. Abet's line to be correct later.>doesn't seem like much by 4chan standardsI mean, if you go to a slower board like
>>>/vst/, getting 200 posts in 5 days all in one thread is actually pretty impressive even on 4chan :P
