>>56335018I agree on one thing, this argument is getting stupid.
>Assembly is considered obsoleteActually it isn't, just has very special cases
>TLS in BrowserThat doesn't help for accessing anything outside a browser, also why the fuck would you use a legacy system for web browsing?
>China... I don't even need to further explain that one being a mess in terms of technology
>Windows 3.1/95As I already explained, there is re-used code, that does not mean it's the same thing.
>Comparing 98 to ME... it's like you are arguing against yourself for me at this point.
>XP 20th anniversaryAre you fucking trolling? This was released in fucking 2005, not even Vista was out yet! XP was still the latest OS when this came out. Did you even research what this thing is, or saw "20th anniversary" and assume it was a re-release of XP two decades later? It's basically a collector's edition.
You seriously don't know jack what you're talking about, but then again, what can I expect from someone who thinks a company keeping a legacy system or two just to control an out of date piece of their infrastructure that hasn't been updated yet (which the entire world does, not just asia) is akin to millions of people using an OS over two decades old en-masse as if it was the most normal thing in the world.
