>>57298085>both of these books on top are specifically Sada's bookbut different copies of her's, yes
>simply believe what the game shows youThat's not what you're doing though. What's your reason for not believing this line then?
>"The time machine is a device that the original professor and I worked on together. It sends Poké Balls to a different point on the timeline to catch Pokémon there, and it can then draw them back here to the present. When she was alive, Professor Sada/Turo had a great fascination with Pokémon from another age—what you might call ancient/future Pokémon. Even as we speak, the time machine continues to automatically draw ancient/future Pokémon to this time."I'm listening to the game, as well as when it tells me a million times that they're pokemon from thebpast and future and that they're genetically descendants or ancestors to modern day pokemon. You're taking only one line of a professor who didn't even see a paradox yet as gospel truth when they know absolutely nothing about where they come from at that point. Bybelieving that, you're actively throwing away the rest of the game without addressing it and fitting it into your theory.
At least when I "fill in" holes, I'm not peddling fan fiction for the conclusion. That's me engaging your questions in a way that still incorporates everything and doesn't have to literally ignore the things you are bringing up and how that it's still possible in many ways. Had you actually thought about your theory and if it worked or not, you'd have done the same instead of blanket ignorance and selectively hearing the game's words.
>The 3D model doesn't look like the title screen book eitherYes it does it's so easy to see how they got from one to the next drawing layers. Your screenshot is dark so brightness differences aren't really perceived.
