>>47090978>where did those Pokemon originally come fromI think the closest to an official answer to this question was in Shudo's books, and if I remember correctly he based it off the Christian Bible (I think that results in them starting to mysteriously appear one day). But those books are only canon to themselves. Either way we have divine Pokémon nowadays so that could be the case nonetheless. Maybe the new game will explore this, who knows.
>Where are they coming from?Nobody knows.
>For their species it might be normal to always have these dual-births, one big and one smallThey refer to the small one as "infant", "young", "baby", "child" and "offspring" and to the big one as "parent" and "mother" though.
From Ultra Moon:
>When the mother sees the back of her Mega-Evolved child, it makes her think of the day when her child will inevitably leave her.>ExeggcuteI don't know what relevance that would have other than resembling eggs. It's not like Kangaskhan where we literally have a mother coming out of a Pokémon Egg.
>trying to get clarification of the exact headcanonThere is no headcanon. I am only referencing official material. It would be a headcanon if I tried to give an explanation for it, but I'm not.
>Pokemon from different Egg Groups having sex. Why does that matter?What would the argment for them to NOT have sex be if they're unrelated?
>the Egg that they are then born out ofYou're assuming Pokémon are born out of Pokémon Eggs. If Pokémon Eggs aren't eggs there is no guarantee that they are.
>you claimed you never said thisI never said anything about babies having sex with themselves inside eggs, or that I have definitive answers, or that I "accepted my statement that they are unrelated is a theory hence headcanon", or anything else you came up with to discredit what I said instead of actually addressing it.
