>>58914098>Yet you couldn't even mention a second positive.The OP copypasta mention's Pokémon's TCG, in comparison to the Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG. While the latter does have some noteworthy success/popularity, Pokémon TCG has more so. Pokémon cards are really valued and the Pokémon TCG is more known.
>And the supposed first positive is just that it makes money.It only JUST makes money? It makes money for a reason, there's much about Pokémon that many people like and thus spend money on Pokémon stuff. Simple.
Some of the other lines from this thread's OP's copypasta are just kind of nothing lines. Such as:
>Shuntaro Furukawa-sama, former employee of The Pokémon Company, current Nintendo CEO, and my master.>TPC-sama, my one and only true love and other master.The copypasta has Pikachu as the subject. Any specific Pikachu? Uh... No. Pikachu is a species, and you know, fictional, and Pokémon's not exactly a very fourth-wall breaking franchise. So talking about "Pikachu"'s relationships to the real-life people who work on the on the franchise, doesn't really give the intended effect of this copypasta format.
As for most of the other stuff, they have their own issues. Like how when we're talking about an entertainment franchise, well, that's subjective opinion. The copypasta doesn't have much objective matters relating to Pokémon. Like I said earlier in this thread:
>it would be funny if someone made the opposite version of this copypasta with the opposite version of the copypasta format used, the one where the subject gets intentionally positive bias instead of negative. Yeah. That will much easier for Pokémon.>>58914107Let me guess. The point is that, Pokémon, despite making so much money, is apparently of no value? Yeah... Sure. Keeping telling yourself that...
