>>54673389There's a handful of denialfags that range from just going
>no>ywnbawto actually at least putting effort into responding even if the responses are disingenuous at best. Then there's the anons that go
>to my understanding, imagination theory is based on (one key aspect of the theory and total disregard of all the other pieces of evidence)who then argue based on that standpoint basically not acknowledging any other argument. It makes it difficult to distinguish between someone who is serious and just doesn't understand vs someone who just wants (you)s.
