>>57175238>All this proves is that there are multiple bad gamesNo it doesn't. No one claimed a game is bad because it introduced bad pokemon. But when bad pokemon are introduced, they should be given proper attention to introduce them properly
>You had to change the what the post saidBuy enough about you assuming "no new pokemon = bad game" when no one said that. What was said was the amount that the new pokemon were drowned out by the old
>the critique is completely meaninglessNo, you brought it up to genwar. The critique is perfectly valid, as new pokemon should be presented properly. You have no rebuttal to this and XY absolutely presented them improperly
>>57175331See
>>57174129Enough with the retarded victim complex
>>57175350Yes
>>57175418XY has next to no lore and teasing of legendaries before you catch them
>>57175462>>57175520>doesn't understand the concept of propaganda gripping the region like a political movement.If your country's leader did something treasonous with the only evidence being you, sorry but he'd stay in power
>>57175584>Cynthia>Looker postgame
>Caitlinpostgame of origin game
These didn't take away from the new things in Unova, like they did in XY's case, making the main campaign feel like a complete retread. All those other things you listed are normal tropes of the series that people came to expect and felt no nostalgia for. Oh, and XY has all of these as well, except adds ACTUAL pandering like their handling of Megas, copy+pasting a fucking forest from Kanto, handing you literal starters from older regions with Megas over the Kalos starters which intrinsically hogs spotlight, forcing Kanto encounters, giving nostalgia giftmons over new mons like they used to, throwing around dexes of 151, having a snorlax that only opens a bridge via flute, an EXACT retread of a Kanto story beat essentially completely word for word
>>57174237https://arch.b4k.co/vp/thread/57128310/#57128343Liar BTFO
>>57179670This.