>>41954263Some guy who spends about 10 hours each day refreshing the catalog to defend SSh. He has a distinct posting style and reuses many of the same images so is easy to recognise. He is known to samefag frequently and never brings up any valid counterarguments to people's complaints.
If you see a post and want to know it's yawnfag look for;
>variations on the phrase dextranny>"muh stantler">hates gen 4 and 5>"x game did this badly too so it's ok that SSh does it badly">"x game removed a feature so it's ok that SSh removes a feature">uses the starter's signiture moves as 'proof' that all SSh animations are good>frequently quotes half the thread>"not a flaw">like >>41953889 said he posts mocking replies, usually just by copying you verbatim >lies about aspects of SSh to make it look better, ignores people that correct him 