>>12094179>Let's go step by step into breaking down your buttfrustration.Classic defensive response, you have to assert your opponent is "mad" to make yourself feel like the rational one. I'd like R/S remakes, I'm just saying that it is far from being a sure thing.
>Care to explain why?I did, read on please.
>That has nothing to do with why it would be bad for Pokemon. What does other franchises not having remakes have to do with anything?Because we're discussing whether or not a remake is likely. You pointing out that R/S/E were popular in terms of ALL videogames does not address the fact that less than 1% of videogames get remakes. And its YOU who brought up other videogame sales in the first place.
>wait, what would make if qualify? you didnt mention any criteria it had to meet.Please read on.
>Then what the fuck is the problem?Why do you keep taking fragments of sentences out of context and replying to them, and then responding to the rest of the argument in the next paragraph? This is fucking retarded.
>Well, remakes have a story and characters already made. That would definitely cut the time down to produce a game significantly. Not really. I could come up with Pokemon characters and story in my sleep. The real meat of production is the programming and assets. Unless they reused the assets from R/S/E (Not likely) it would still be normal development time. You would essentially have to remake the entire region from the ground up. Now consider that vs. making "sequels" like BW2 in which the entire region is already made. If remakes are easy money, then sequels are by definition easier money. Any argument you could make for the ease of R/S remakes could be applied to BW2 style sequels MORE readily.
>We got HS/SSAnd G/S sold nearly twice as much as R/S
