>>12373834Listen, you goddamn mongrel.
"Literal" is a word used to express a word true to fact, without any kind of exageration or metaphor. It is used to describe things that are factual.
Pancham is panda in the context that is a creature based on the real life panda bear species.
Is it a "literal panda"? No, it is not because, ignoring the fact that is not a real living creature (that alone not fitting with the description of a "literal panda") it doesn't even have the same anatomic proportionsas one, also the fact that is has anthropomorphic expressions.
The only idiot that should be purged here is you.
