>>12405330http://www.pocketmonsters.net/episodes/1495#PicturesI think it's that image, I don't speak moonrune, but by deduction it should be this one and what we see?
A question mark, so it's a question not an assertion.
>If Sylveon were an existing type, then the tests would be sufficient to determine it. If the test fails to achieve its intended purpose, there's only one logical conclusion - that whatever type it is doesn't fit the system the tests are based on, and therefore it can only be a new type.Or just that we shouldn't take the tests too seriously, because the tests were made on a human dressed as Sylveon, not Sylveon.
You can dress me as a vaporeon and throw me in a fire, I will burn even if vaporeon resist fire.
I don't say that we won't get a new type, I just say that screaming: "Sylveon is weak to poison, it's a fact" is totally false
