>>12409514>Looks a lot like a Normal type to me. Also, there are pokemon that don't look like their respective types. Look at Stunfisk.Is Stunfisk an eeveelution? And while Sylveon looks like SOME normal types, it's far from an obvious normal type. Eevee is an obvious normal type. Is Espeon a poison type because it's purpleish and poison types are purpleish? Or is Umbreon a ghost type because it's black and a lot of Pokemon are black? They go straight to the point with eevelutions.
>Umbras don't represent evil. Also a sylv- could represent bugs. And once again, stunfisk has fisk in the name. Which means fish, and it is not water type. Despite looking the part and having the name.Again, is Stunfisk an eeveelution? Umbras don't represent evil, but Umbreon's names do represent night and darkness, and being associated with night/darkness is a trait for a good number of dark types.
>So were kids saying Mewthree on the playground. Same with Leafeon. Should we believe there's a Mew under the truck?Did those kids give precise English names that weren't announced yet rather than general ideas that could easily come true? Did those kids leak most of the Kanto pokedex?
>Has what to do with fairies? THey're beyond science, you idiot. GEE, WHAT DOES INTRODUCING A NEW BIOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTE FOR POKEMON HAVE TO DO WITH A BIOLOGY THEME? WTF YOU'RE SUCH AN IDIOT LOL
>A comedy show that didn't out right say anything.An official source that still gives legit information.
implying that fairyfags are being just as dumb as lightfags in gen 5 is outright stupid. There's various evidence supporting a new type this time.
