>>12507552>"these are ones that I would LIKE but Gamefreak can get away with?"I'm using Gardevoir as an example, just like Chimecho, because those are the ones I used in the first post.
They are just to show that what should or not be Fairy is totally based on opinion, and that "Pokémon that make sense" is very subjective.
Wording it as "the ones GF can get away with" also (apparently) means you still think there are ones that are fact and it would be a crime to not retype.
>But it's still mystical.So is Ho-Oh, which you find to not be fairy.
>if the Draining Kiss move turns out to be confirmed.If it does, and if Luvdisc has it. But even then, it could still not be Fairy, because having a Fairy attack does not mean it'll be a Fairy type.
But when it is confirmed, we'll probably also already know whether Luvdisc is or not Fairy, if there even is really Fairy.
>Except, you know, the ones that have obvious concepts based on fairies and ones that outright mention fairy in their names and species names.Arcanine is the legendary pokémon, but it's not legendary. And Volcarona is not the sun.
Having fairy concepts is back to the "Charizard/Gyarados is not a Dragon" argument. Looking like fairy doesn't mean they'll be typed Fairy. Different typings that also make total sense can be argued for a lot of existing pokémon.
Snorunt is based off a spirit, but it's not ghost or psychic and I don't think it should be fairy either. Glalie has names related to demons and ghosts in several languages, but it's not ghost nor dark.
>But don't be surprised if it happens.I won't. Like I said, that's just what I would like to see. GF can and surely will pull anything out of it's ass and we better like it.
