>>12581990>being this retardedNot only do I realize that, but I explicitly referenced things tangential to Lucario. You've failed to tell me how that warrants judging what the thread asks about--Lucario, which is only him and his characteristics (typing, design, theme, etc.)--based on things outside of that.
Take the picture I posted for example. There would have been nothing wrong if the guy said "I don't like that you like it and what you do concerning it", but that's not what he says. And it's true to life--in threads asking about Fennekin, people go on about "furbait" and "hurr durr fire starters so edgy"
Nothing exists in a vacuum, but when the question is posed in a vacuum, you answer it in a vacuum.
