>>12585396>Deal with itGee, never heard that one before.
--
If I relate a Pokemon to a dick, say, it might sound ridiculous, but it has base, it's an observation, a description. But if you resort to name=calling, it's baseless. You might deduce that from my replies, but it's a personal thing. In an argument, it looks as though you're just trying to throw me off rather than argue your point. It looks as though you just want to type abuse at me, and that even you think that you argument is futile.
Ok, I think I'm repeated myself quite enough here. Everyone else can refer to the thread unless they have anything fresh.
