[31 / 16 / ?]
Quoted By: >>12602451 >>12602793
[If anything else fails, THEN SALAMENCE APPRECIATION THREAD!]
I'd like to join the fold of those who happen to appreciate this dragon pokemon.
However, I am not super crazy about its design.
While the premise, overall concept and structure seem more appealing than it is in case of dragons like Dragonite or Garchomp, there are still elements of its design that feel out of place for my current gusto:
>Oversimplified, flattened axe-like wings;
>Lack of continuation between the neck's underside and armoured stomach;
>Head composition...
Care to explain why these are the symptoms of a well-developed pokemon? My taste remains pretty low, so I am open to lectures on it.
I'd like to join the fold of those who happen to appreciate this dragon pokemon.
However, I am not super crazy about its design.
While the premise, overall concept and structure seem more appealing than it is in case of dragons like Dragonite or Garchomp, there are still elements of its design that feel out of place for my current gusto:
>Oversimplified, flattened axe-like wings;
>Lack of continuation between the neck's underside and armoured stomach;
>Head composition...
Care to explain why these are the symptoms of a well-developed pokemon? My taste remains pretty low, so I am open to lectures on it.
