>>12606459What does its rarity or difficulty in being obtained have to do with whether or not its type is changing? What kind of logical deduction warrants that? Why do people always spout out random shit under the guise of being an argument? It always shocks me how the most basic logic goes over people's heads
I don't think they're changing dual type pokemon for gen VI, but for fucks sake, if they did it with Rotom, they did it with Rotom.
