>>12620625Sorry for the delay, just went out to the dentist
>Okay, why don't they make other stuff resist it? Don't see your point here.Hmmm, I don't know. Why would having one resist prove my point that Dragon types can deal heavy damage almost everything and be a good reason for something new?
>These Pokemon are SUPPOSED to be obscenely powerful because they're designed to be an OP piece of shit you have to plan on destroying. Just used pseudo as an example since we're talking OU, even weaker Dragons (like Kingdra) are still fairly OP. Just because something is powerful by design doesn't mean it shouldn't have another weakness.
>If everything was perfectly balanced, we could just pick whatever the fuck team we wanted and just flip a coin for the victor(Predictions) (Team adhesion)
Frankly, you know that's bullshit. You even state you've "made a handful of successful OU teams without Dragons" so assuming you've faced Dragons using those teams, your abillity to predict how someone will use them will sway the odds in your favour. (again, not a valid reason why something that is OP shouldn't be nerfed)
>Blah blah, why would Game Freak blah blahOutright ignoring my point, even assuming Gamefreak wanted to take "new spin on the game to get more attention" why would they choose, of all types, Dragon to be Fairy's strength when they could have chosen Poison by that logic.
>I dunno, hard counters?Exactly, you DON'T know (that many at least). Dragons are next to Normal types in having phenomenal type coverage options with a few exceptions (Kyurem being an obvious example of a deficent drag). There aren't many hard counters in comparison to every other type.
Again with the >Other options
You fail to mention anything specific which is more effective than just choosing a Dragon and wreaking everything. I too have made quite a few teams without Dragons (Trick Room teams especially) but I'm not blind to how these things outclass other types in areas other than BST.
