>>12751737No, but I sure don't see him going around calling other people retards because they don't believe his theory.
>>12751741I love how you reply to half of my points with "HURR, SUBJECTIVE OPINION," yet also thinking that replacing a type is too "consequential" is also subjective.
>ONE Pokemon's individual formes, one generation later to emphasize the gimmick nature of the Pokemon.One generation later is completely irrelevant. People also said they wouldn't re-type gen 1/2 Pokemon like Jigglypuff because they're too far back. Yet they did. Gamefreak. Doesn't. Care. Who says they can't re-type dual types to emphasize the new type?
There's still way more reason to believe they might re-type dual types. There's no reason to believe they never will because Rotom contradicts it. But of course to you Rotom doesn't count for some completely arbitrary differences you made up.
>>12751764Look at the Fairy egg group. Most of them are Pokemon with cutesy body styles. Marill also doesn't seem to fit the literal Fairy definition at all, it's just a cutesy mouse.
>No they haven'tGo transfer a Rotom forme from gen 4 to 5 and see what happens.
