>>12855056Okay I can't even tell which anon is which anymore. SOMEBODY said that Fennekin will almost certainly be Fire/Psychic. Someone else misconstrued that as being a claim that it will ABSOLUTELY be that type, which was never said, only that this is the most likely scenario based on evidence and past patterns
inb4 muh patterns inb4 op can't inb4 such as
>>12854687 and
>>12854229. I don't know where you in particular that I'm currently responding to fall in all of this, and you might want to clarify. But NOBODY in here is claiming absolutes, so whomever is misconstruing that needs to stop.
Fennekin's evos will MOST LIKELY be Fire/Psychic.