>>12980499>Stop saying "normalfags" unironicallyNo. The only people who would complain about this are normalfags. Shut up.
>>12980566>What's a normalfag to you?Normalfags are essentially people who don't identify with 4chan culture. They're people who'd say, "Look at that guy, he's different, what a loser." They care about social status, don't associate with people they consider below them due to not having many friends, and flaunt how popular they are. A good indicator of normalfaggotry is using social networks. People who brag about how many followers they have on Twitter, or how many friends they have on Facebook, are normalfags.
>Someone with an active social life?You can have an active social life and not care about social status. If you get friends to find people who like the same shit you do, then you're not a normalfag. If you make friends just for the sake of popularity, then you're a normalfag.
>But when you use the term "normalfag", you're not making a good case for yourself.The only reason the term "normalfag" exists is because your average 4chan user has always heard normalfags tell him "Wow, you're different, you're such a fucking loser." So 4chan has come up with an insult that means "Wow, you're trying to be like everyone else, you're such a fucking loser."
>You're just flaunting your NEETdom like a badge of honor.>implying that everyone here's a NEET>trying to use NEET as an insultAs a reminder, the only people who use NEET as an insult are normalfags, because they think that since you have that status, you're different, and as a result you're below them.
>>12980618>Please, define "normie"See "normalfag"
>I'd love to hear what's so awful about them in your opinion that they're something to be mocked. They're awful because they're the reason non-normalfags are ostracized from society. They're awful because they see difference as a stigma. They're awful because people like you say that we're awful for insulting them for these reasons.
