>>13090039But Anon, if liking certain Pokemon means that the person is a furry, then almost 98% of this board would consist of furries. Leaving you and others who get so rage in the cage about it as the minority.
By your apparent logic, any person who has a pet would be a furry, because apparently a person can't like a furry creature without being one. That is quite a limited world view, and is very sad. You should get that looked at by a psychologist.
