>>13173214Only if the resulting image is still "nsfw" or "furry" in nature. There's images artists draw that have bits added that really don't even look like they should be there, in some cases editing them out turns the image into a perfectly acceptable picture.
You wouldn't guess there was a dick randomly slapped on this one unless I told you. Or if you knew the artist and his general propensity towards putting dicks on everything for any reason, and I think it looks way better when "cleaned up" like this.
