/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #13365669

[123 / 8 / ?]

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 17:53:10 No.13365669 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13365852 >>13366016 >>13366763 >>13366790 >>13366859 >>13367015 >>13367233 >>13367500 >>13368027 >>13368510 >>13369242

So does this poke holes in the "kangaskhan baby is a cubone" theory?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 17:53:53 No.13365683 Report

Quoted By:

No, because it's mother is right next to it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 17:55:45 No.13365720 Report

Quoted By: >>13365793

The baby is actually an underdeveloped twin. That's why all Kangaskhan are born with babies in their pouches. The scientists just thought it was a baby because scientists in the pokemon world are idiots.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 17:58:45 No.13365793 Report

Quoted By: >>13366671

>>13365720
So every Kangaskhan has a twin
lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 17:59:37 No.13365810 Report

Quoted By:

And it only took 15 years!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:02:24 No.13365852 Report

Quoted By: >>13365986

>>13365669
Not really?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:05:00 No.13365891 Report

Quoted By: >>13365951 >>13366330

This raises so many questions, though.
What is the baby? Can it be separated from the main Kangaskhan? What's its name? Why have we never seen it before? We know it's a kid Kangaskhan from the ability's name, but what about all the other Kangaskhan that ever existed? Did their kids live and die in the pouch?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:08:19 No.13365951 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365891
to live and die in L.A.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:09:44 No.13365986 Report

Quoted By: >>13366585

>>13365852
Explain. This thing still neither has the color or physiology. AND STILL NOT THE TYPE. How in the name of Arceus is this still possible

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:10:59 No.13366016 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
Not at all, you really think that back in 1996 they had mega evos planned? The theory may have been a concept that was scrapped and due to it being scrapped it didn't make a difference when it came to mega evolution time

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:12:36 No.13366053 Report

Quoted By:

the theory was full of holes in the first place

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1304878618994.png, 170KiB, 308x301

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:13:10 No.13366066 Report

Quoted By: >>13366078 >>13366155 >>13374469

>Implying the skin of young animals doesn't change color as it grows older

On a related note, Kangaskhans used to be my favorite pokemons until they became 100% female

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:14:18 No.13366078 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366066
>no girls allowed
What are you, a faggot?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:18:24 No.13366155 Report

Quoted By: >>13366198

>>13366066
>Kangaskhans used to be my favorite pokemons until they became 100% female

Mpreg fetish?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:20:01 No.13366198 Report

Quoted By: >>13366484

>>13366155
>carrying a baby in a pouch is pregnancy!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:26:56 No.13366330 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365891
I'd tell you, but you're not ready for the answer. Go on believing that the mother and it's baby are one entity, though. Yes, I am aware of other pokemon that are multiple entities. They couldn't act separately, though. This was clearly ment to signify a separation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:30:26 No.13366403 Report

Quoted By: >>13366424

Good, I'm glad that Cubonefags can no longer poison a strong, beautiful woman like Kangaskhan with their edgy fanfic bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:31:14 No.13366424 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366403
You do know that woman is the name given to the female of the human species, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:34:40 No.13366484 Report

Quoted By: >>13366811

>>13366198
>male marsupials have pouches

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:36:24 No.13366514 Report

Quoted By:

>muh feels

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:40:08 No.13366585 Report

Quoted By: >>13366917

>>13365986
>color
By that logic it's not a kid Kangaskhan, either. Clearly Kangaskhans are light purplish when young and become brown when they grow older.
>physiology
The regular baby does. This one is mega-evolved, of course it looks different.
>type
Types can change. See: lots of evolutions, forms and abilities.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO a-bomb-JC.png, 247KiB, 320x276

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:43:39 No.13366642 Report

Quoted By: >>13366708

It's had holes in it since the first retard crawled out of the primordial ooze and suggest it. For example, the fact that a Kangaskhan's head is the size of a Cubone's entire body.

It was always a shitty theory.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:44:55 No.13366671 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365793
No one had a problem with Exeggute

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:46:16 No.13366708 Report

Quoted By: >>13366772

>>13366642
Cubonefags are just mad really. It's as bad as "Gengar is Clefairy's shadow"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:48:43 No.13366763 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
It's so cuuuuuuute

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:49:11 No.13366772 Report

Quoted By: >>13366932

>>13366708
>Gengar is Clefairy's shadow
Hahaha, people actually believe that? It's Clefable's shadow.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:50:27 No.13366790 Report

Quoted By: >>13366814 >>13366815

>>13365669
Fucking Christ Gamefreak, take that model and make it its own Pokemon. I hate pre-evos, but Kangaskhan is the one fucking Pokemon that having one makes some sense for. And it would shut up the Cuboners forever (maybe).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:51:46 No.13366811 Report

Quoted By: >>13367258 >>13369136

>>13366484
They're called horse fishes you retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:51:50 No.13366814 Report

Quoted By: >>13366841

>>13366790
>wanting useless prevos

Kill yourself

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:51:48 No.13366815 Report

Quoted By: >>13366861 >>13366864

>>13366790
Even if it has a pre-evo, it will still not solve why kangaskhan is born with the baby. It should have been fixed in Gen 2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:53:07 No.13366841 Report

Quoted By: >>13366849

>>13366814
I just said I hate prevos you ignoramus. Learn to use your eyes. In a case where one provides a useful context though it would be appropriate.

Bitch.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:53:40 No.13366849 Report

Quoted By: >>13366890

>>13366841

It doesn't matter if you hate them if you say that you want one in the same breath.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:53:58 No.13366859 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
Kinda sucks it's not a pre-evo. Instead it's a megstone "mega evolve" bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:53:57 No.13366861 Report

Quoted By: >>13366888

>>13366815
Yeah, seriously. They should have given it a pre-evo and maybe even stopped putting the kid in its sprites, like they did with Mantine/Remoraid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:54:03 No.13366864 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366815

It would have been cool as fuck to use a baby kanga in jhoto and kangaskhan in the pokemon league

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:54:08 No.13366867 Report

Quoted By:

No, because the baby has Mega-evolved. Are you stupid?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:55:21 No.13366888 Report

Quoted By: >>13366951

>>13366861
> like they did with Mantine/Remoraid.
But they still do that in the official art and shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:55:25 No.13366890 Report

Quoted By: >>13366912

>>13366849
I hate them when they serve no purpose. I hate 'pointless' prevos like you suggested. This one would have a point.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:56:34 No.13366912 Report

Quoted By: >>13366923 >>13367168

>>13366890

No it wouldn't. Kasgaskhan is fine the way it is. Giving it a prevo to sate your autist tendencies is just as pointless as anything else.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:56:46 No.13366917 Report

Quoted By: >>13366958

>>13366585
If a connection was to be made AT ALL to Cubone, THEY WOULD'VE FLIPPING DONE IT. Yes, even for the flipping Mega Form. It would've been obvious. This thing has no such thing, so it is myth BUSTED. I don't care about the beta process of red/green, they released it as having already canned the idea. Everything else is denying that the truths revealed in the subsequent gens weren't real either. If you're going to do that, allow me to express my disgust in a comprehensible form. *gen 1 Screech*

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:57:13 No.13366923 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366912
Well you're a faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:57:44 No.13366932 Report

Quoted By: >>13366960 >>13366993

>>13366772
It is neither. They have literally no features in common at all. Not a single one. Shut the fuck up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:58:40 No.13366951 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366888
I don't mind that though, the Pokémon do still have a symbiotic relationship. I'm happy as long as it's not in the sprite.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:59:01 No.13366958 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366917
This really.

Are 90's autists really this raging?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 18:59:12 No.13366960 Report

Quoted By: >>13366974 >>13367003

>>13366932
>They have literally no features in common at all.
Except for the same headspikes, wings, body shape, and one literally being named for the second part of DoppelGanger?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:00:13 No.13366974 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366960
You're arguing the design that Gen 1 had a common thing. Might I remind you of Nidoking/queen and Rhydon too?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:00:54 No.13366984 Report

Quoted By:

Make the baby a preevo
Friendship evolution to kanghaskhan
Level up while holding new item 'skull' evolves it to cubone

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:01:18 No.13366993 Report

Quoted By: >>13367044

>>13366932
None at all, except the exact same general body shape, plus Gengar has its name come from doppelgänger as well as being the 'Shadow Pokémon'.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:01:44 No.13367002 Report

Quoted By: >>13367044 >>13367203

"baby" Kangaskhan isnt a prevo because it IS a Kangaskhan.

"baby" Kangaskhans age/grow into the bigger Kangashkans, and dont evolve, as is implied by the dex entries.

>the infant rarely ventures out of its mothers protective pouch until its three years old

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:01:48 No.13367003 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366960
They don't have the same headspikes. They don't have the same body shape, either: one is a circle and the other an egg with limbs at very different points on the body and with a different number and shape of fingers, toes, etc. Ears are different shapes and angles, gengar has more back spikes and at a different angle than clefable has wing tips, and on and fucking on. It was always a stupid theory and you're stupid for having it.

Enormous Faggot

Enormous Faggot Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:02:27 No.13367015 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
No, the kangaskhan baby turns into cubone when it is sad and shit 'cause its mom died. mom still alive, so the little shit is not a lonely cubone

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:04:09 No.13367044 Report

Quoted By: >>13367182

>>13366993
All those last two points mean is that it has a concept. It doesn't mean it has to be the shadow of another pokemon. Especially a pokemon it doesn't share anything in common with.

It doesn't have the exact same general body shape, either. Go ahead and pull up the official art and draw the basic shapes. You're blind as a mole if you think it's close.
>>13367002
Truth. Kangaskhan seems to be the only monster to just age instead of metamorphisize.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:08:29 No.13367122 Report

Quoted By:

Explain why neither can have the eggs of the other, both cases. Yes, this is a valid argument because if it was their intention to connect them, then they would've done it when this was introduced. (barring that they won't fix things for other pokes, as indicated by miltank being grouped with tauros

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:11:49 No.13367168 Report

Quoted By: >>13367241 >>13367294 >>13367492 >>13368133

>>13366912
>Kangaskhan is born with a baby
>All female species
>Where does babby come from?
>How is babby formed?
It's the one instance where a prevo is actually necessary.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO same body shape.png, 72KiB, 509x468

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:12:33 No.13367182 Report

Quoted By: >>13367226 >>13367304

>>13367044
But it has to be the doppelganger of SOMETHING, or it wouldn't be a doppelganger.
Also I did what you said and look, they're the same!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:13:44 No.13367203 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367002
If male and female Nidoran count as different Pokémon there's no reason why child and adult Kangaskhan couldn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:15:17 No.13367226 Report

Quoted By: >>13367268 >>13367285

>>13367182
Your fanart made them look the same. The official art has different oval shapes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:15:39 No.13367233 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
So which came first, the Kangaskhan or the baby?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:16:34 No.13367241 Report

Quoted By: >>13367260

>>13367168
>prevo is introduced
>evovles into a Pokemon with another prevo inside of it

Great fix.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:17:53 No.13367258 Report

Quoted By: >>13367286

>>13366811
>horse fishes

sea horses

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:18:08 No.13367260 Report

Quoted By: >>13367294

>>13367241
>prevo introduced
>introduce male Kangaskhan
>only possible to evolve with a male in the team
Why not?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:18:44 No.13367268 Report

Quoted By: >>13367285 >>13367294

>>13367226
They're still quad-limbed winged oval shaped Pokemon with head spikes.

You know Gengar didn't HAVE to look like that. It could've been much more like its previous two forms.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:19:53 No.13367285 Report

Quoted By: >>13367295 >>13367334

>>13367226
It's a little bit rounder, sure, but the general body shape is still the same. And shadows are usually a bit distorted anyway.

>>13367268
Gengar doesn't have wings, bro.

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:19:56 No.13367286 Report

Quoted By: >>13368585

>>13367258
Horse fishes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:20:25 No.13367294 Report

Quoted By: >>13367336

>>13367268
Except I can see Haunter in Gengar. if anything it's Gastly that looks off.

>>13367260
>>13367168
>what is egg group

stop being autistic

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:20:30 No.13367295 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367285
>Gengar doesn't have wings, bro.
Winged mega-evo confirmed.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO I said to draw the shapes, retard..png, 10KiB, 357x194

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:20:57 No.13367304 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367182
Blind as a god damn mole. It was just NAMED Gengar. Hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gjenganger

Gengar is a corruption of a word basically meaning GHOST. It being a shadow pokemon indicates it is some kind of living shadow, fitting for a gas monster. It doesn't have to be the ghost or shadow of any other pokemon any more than clefable has to LITERALLY BE A FUCKING STAR AND HAVE ITS OWN PLANETS.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:22:42 No.13367329 Report

Quoted By:

the babby is the same as it was before, except that it has "evolved". It's essentially the "first" stage before Kangaskhan.

It'd have been nice for it to be a prevo though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:22:51 No.13367334 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367285
Shadows don't have limbs in the wrong places and a different number of digits. Shadows don't have different tails of different sizes and different orientations. Shadows don't have different hair.

They're not related. They never, ever have been.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:22:56 No.13367336 Report

Quoted By: >>13367366

>>13367294
Then in that case you just need a male in the same egg group in the team to evolve it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:24:34 No.13367355 Report

Quoted By:

There are self-replicating species in nature, that is asexual, which lay eggs. It is perfectly fine and needs no justification at all that a thing is born with more on the way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:25:07 No.13367366 Report

Quoted By: >>13367399

>>13367336
I... what

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:27:50 No.13367399 Report

Quoted By: >>13367447

>>13367366
>Kanga prevo
>male in the same egg group in team
>level up prevo
>get Kangaskhan
Alternatively you could do something like Happiny and give it an item or something.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:28:10 No.13367403 Report

Quoted By:

It makes perfect sense, you know why? Because Pokemon is a little game for kids and Gamefreak does not care what your theories are. Stop over thinking it. Pokemon has never made sense scientifically.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:28:57 No.13367413 Report

Quoted By: >>13367430

Whatever. This is the way the game wishes to do it. There is no connection in the game, so it doesn't exist there. Everything else is fan theory. If you want to go into fan theory, then what point is there when no one is going to agree what it is? I'll believe what I want and you believe what you want, but don't you dare use the game as evidence when the evidence does not exist.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:29:37 No.13367424 Report

Quoted By:

If anything you could say that kanghaskan can reproduce by budding and that's why they all have babies. Done.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:30:07 No.13367430 Report

Quoted By: >>13367475

>>13367413
But Anon, there is evidence that the baby in Kanga's pouch is a baby, and not some deformed tumor..

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:30:56 No.13367447 Report

Quoted By: >>13367528

>>13367399
You do know that is unneeded/superficial. You don't need male versions of Petilitil and Cottonee.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:33:00 No.13367475 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367430
Who cares? Not Gamefreak.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:34:08 No.13367492 Report

Quoted By: >>13367577

>>13367168
Kangaskhan is born with a baby because sprites.

>all female species
Ever heard about parthenogenesis?

>where does the baby come from?
>how is baby formed?
The same as every other babies

BXL

BXL Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:34:23 No.13367500 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
no not at all

cubone is a kangaskhan whos mother died, mega-khagaskhans baby has a mother still, and its gained its looks and power from the mega stone. it is a completely different Pokemon than cubone.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:36:30 No.13367528 Report

Quoted By: >>13367563

>>13367447
Yeah because Petilil and Cottonee totally have unexplained babies in their sprites.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:38:47 No.13367563 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367528
I was going for the "why the need to have another gender"

Again, Kangaskhan's species concept revolves around parenting. That's why it has a kid. The Pokemon is known collectively as a single thing much like Exeggute or Klink. People are just dumb.

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:39:26 No.13367577 Report

Quoted By: >>13367626

>>13367492
>Kangaskhan is born with a baby because sprites.
>what is gameplay/universe separation

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:42:24 No.13367626 Report

Quoted By: >>13367671

>>13367577
And yet people are dumb enough not to think that there have been Pokemon that are "more than one but counted as one"

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:44:53 No.13367671 Report

Quoted By: >>13367687

>>13367626
Yeah there are, but obviously not every Kangaskhan has a child. Just like Cubone being born with a skull, it's just a representation for the game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:46:01 No.13367687 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367671
>being this deluded
I bet you think anime is canon too

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:48:52 No.13367721 Report

Quoted By:

I love how people forget Kangaskhan can breed with males outside it's species. I'm done trying to convince them that the game is not the whole truth, though. Their sad adherence to their already messed up system continues to hold us back. If I could restructure this thing from the ground up, I would, but I can't. Instead, all I have is what I wish to believe, and that is that this showing us what happens when the baby grows up. It's a "hidden" evo line. (yet, I choose to continue seeing the other Mega forms as being a limit break and not a true evo) This is more an untold part of Kangaskhan's life than the others. You cannot tell me otherwise. I will therefore refrain from arguing your ideas since they can't be proven either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:49:39 No.13367731 Report

Quoted By: >>13367917

No, actually.

See, what you see here is NOT the baby in its true form, it is the baby in mega form. It has no impact on what the baby looks like normally.

For all we know, its normal form could be the spitting image of Cubone.

Probably not though, I never really believed this headcanon in the first place.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:51:04 No.13367754 Report

Quoted By: >>13367826 >>13367830

>Not assuming both male and female Kangaskhan have pouches to care for their baby so they can trade off the child and the one not currently caring for it can go find food without possibly putting the child in harms way.

what is wrong with this thread?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:55:29 No.13367826 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367754
What male Kangaskhan?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:55:49 No.13367830 Report

Quoted By: >>13367849

>>13367754
>male
>pouches

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:57:23 No.13367849 Report

Quoted By: >>13367870

>>13367830
you clearly never read a comic in the 90's

Anonymous

i made this post while taking a shit

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:58:58 No.13367867 Report

Quoted By: >>13367945

The massive size difference between Cubone, Babykahn, and Kangaskahn already kill that theory.
The theory has always been stupid.

Babykahn (Not Mega babykahn, the usual babykahn we're all used to seeing in Kangaskahn's pouch) is already bigger than a Cubone.

Cubone is barely over 1 foot tall. Kangaskahn is over 7 feet tall.

The size difference between them is far too great for Cubone to be able to wear a Kangaskahn skull on it's head.
A Cubone would be able to make a small nest of a Kangaskahn skull, not wear it.

If people would just look at the bloody size differences, then this theory would never have existed.

Stupid fucking theory

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 19:59:01 No.13367870 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367849
I get the joke, yes.

FYI Image cleaned their act in the 2000's.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:02:23 No.13367917 Report

Quoted By: >>13367940

>>13367731
>For all we know, its normal form could be the spitting image of Cubone.
>its normal form which is clearly visible in Kangaskhan's sprite and was seen in its entirety in the anime could be the spitting image of Cubone even though anyone with eyes can see it clearly isn't

Does it hurt to be this stupid?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:03:35 No.13367933 Report

Quoted By:

Parents won't let the baby Kangaskhan fight or be studied by the Pokemon scientists. Simple.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:04:02 No.13367940 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367917
People will throw all logic to the curb for the sake of their "feels" bullshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:04:27 No.13367945 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367867
>baby loses it's mother early on
>doesn't gain nutrients to grow to regular baby size
>has to rely on other sources
But yeah the theory is still bullshit.

John Gamefreak

John Gamefreak Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:06:29 No.13367970 Report

Quoted By:

I am John Gamefreak, and there is no such thing as a baby Kangaskhan. That is actually a part of Kangaskhan.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:10:17 No.13368027 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
That really should have been a prevo to be honest.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:10:51 No.13368033 Report

Quoted By: >>13368062

Kangaskhan comes out with a baby right?
So what if when Kangaskhan fucks it impregnates baby Kangaskhan too
That was when new Kangaskhan is born, the baby also has a baby.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:13:07 No.13368062 Report

Quoted By:

>>13368033
...
......
I like it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:17:47 No.13368133 Report

Quoted By:

>>13367168
pfft everyone know kangaskhan asexually reproduce by budding.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 21KiB, 500x356

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:39:46 No.13368450 Report

Quoted By:

Baby Kangaskhan has more details than Cubone.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:43:37 No.13368510 Report

Quoted By: >>13368531 >>13368574

>>13365669
Pokemon's horrid fanbase will always find a way to defend their stupid theories. Remember when they stated Mew and Ditto had nothing to do?
People still insist on that shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:44:46 No.13368531 Report

Quoted By:

>>13368510
>Remember when they stated Mew and Ditto had nothing to do?

What?

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:48:08 No.13368574 Report

Quoted By:

>>13368510
I can't remember his exact words but I think he just didn't know anything about it. There are too many connections between the two to think that nobody on the whole team had that idea.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1000x1000px-LL-8253b009_opah1.gif, 117KiB, 574x491

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:48:47 No.13368585 Report

Quoted By: >>13368630

>>13367286

Pic related is a horsefish you fucking retard.

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:52:11 No.13368630 Report

Quoted By: >>13368676

>>13368585
They're homonyms.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO seahorse_704_600x450.jpg, 61KiB, 600x450

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:54:41 No.13368676 Report

Quoted By: >>13368737

>>13368630
Pic related, a sea horse. Do they look like homonyms ?

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 20:57:21 No.13368737 Report

Quoted By: >>13368795

>>13368676
>Do they look like homonyms ?

Now that I think about it, they might actually be homophones. Pretty much the same thing though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:00:53 No.13368795 Report

Quoted By: >>13368832 >>13372778

>>13368737
Actually they're neither of those. My point though is that a seahorse is not from teh same specie as a horsea.

Unless you're trolling.

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:04:12 No.13368832 Report

Quoted By:

>>13368795
Nah, they're either homophones or homonyms. I'm sure of it. I'm studying biology and haven't really gotten those two words down yet. It's one or the other for sure.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:26:14 No.13369136 Report

Quoted By: >>13369288

>>13366811
there sea horses you ass hats and
>sea horses
>marsupials

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:30:22 No.13369188 Report

Quoted By: >>13369221

Ability: parental bond
Kangaskhan gets an automatic substitute without HP loss.

>The substitute broke

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:32:39 No.13369221 Report

Quoted By:

>>13369188
The mother acts as a substitute
Cubone confirmed

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:34:27 No.13369242 Report

Quoted By:

>>13365669
Not really.

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:37:49 No.13369288 Report

Quoted By:

>>13369136
Sea horsi are sort of like marsupials. They come from a common ancestor.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 11 Aug 2013 21:41:31 No.13369342 Report

Quoted By:

Even small children are smart enough not to take a sprite at face value.

Are you smarter than a child /vp/?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Aug 2013 01:29:34 No.13372778 Report

Quoted By: >>13372947

>>13368795
Of course he's trolling you retard. Are you literally retarded?

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU

Nine to Five Hero !xPOSER9PtU Mon 12 Aug 2013 01:42:25 No.13372947 Report

Quoted By:

>>13372778
He 8 that b8 without even knowing what kind it was.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Aug 2013 03:34:17 No.13374469 Report

Quoted By:

>>13366066
This has to be one of the dumbest reasons to not like a Pokemon.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches