>>13503955he said OP, MAYBE YOU SHOULD ELABORATE NEXT TIME INSTEAD OF POSTING A CRYPTIC AS FUCK IMAGE THAT COULD MEAN MULTIPLE THINGS UNLESS YOU ARE INTENTIONALLY TRYING TO PISS PEOPLE OFF WITH THE PERPETUATION OF CONFUSION ABOUT THE GIVEN TOPIC AT HAND.
If you couldn't hear him, you could have went back and re-read the post.
Unless you meant that you wanted him to elaborate on what he said, which, admittedly, would be quite ironic.
