/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #13586852

[15 / 3 / ?]

185KiB, 318x325, 1336440204222.png

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:00:12 No.13586852 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13586866 >>13586871 >>13586873

Gen VI Starters > Gen IV Starters = Gen III Starters > Gen I Starters > Gen II Starters >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dogshit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gen V Starters

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1365224653884.png, 85KiB, 276x276

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:03:52 No.13586866 Report

Quoted By:

>>13586852

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:04:51 No.13586871 Report

Quoted By:

>>13586852
>Putting II above V
>Putting II above anything
>VI already on top
>Only basic formes are know

Let me guess, you're one of those idiots that thinks anything get insta-good with a dual type

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:04:54 No.13586872 Report

Quoted By:

That fox is a piece of shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:04:55 No.13586873 Report

Quoted By:

>>13586852
>Gen VI Starters > Gen IV Starters = Gen III Starters
What?
We haven't even seen their evo's yet. The rest seems okay, though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:06:39 No.13586880 Report

Quoted By: >>13586891

Can we clarify the reason of this thread and the benefits about posting in it before starting the greentextload?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1363905124585.jpg, 17KiB, 247x248

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:07:12 No.13586885 Report

Quoted By: >>13586900

>Ranking Gen 6 starters when we haven't even seen their full evolutions

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:08:10 No.13586889 Report

Quoted By:

I hope Gen 6 evolution turn out to be a huge piece of shit just ou of spite or morons like OP

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:08:19 No.13586891 Report

Quoted By:

>>13586880
OP was probably bored. This might help.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:09:03 No.13586900 Report

Quoted By: >>13586914

>>13586885
>Ranking them on top.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:10:03 No.13586906 Report

Quoted By:

Gen I Starters > Gen V Starters > Gen IV Starters > Gen III Starters > Gen II Starters

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:11:31 No.13586914 Report

Quoted By:

>>13586900
>Ranking starters period

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:12:06 No.13586919 Report

Quoted By: >>13587008

1>3>5>4>2

Going by looks

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 17:22:03 No.13587008 Report

Quoted By: >>13587500

>>13586919
Gen V starters had the worst fucking looks ever and IV were some of the best.

ugh emboar. why.
why does oshawoot become some...what
oh so snivy becomes a snake instead of a dragon...that's...COOL.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Aug 2013 18:11:51 No.13587500 Report

Quoted By:

>>13587008
No, people tend to overrate Gen IV starters because MUH DUAL TYPES

Infernape has the same design problems s Emboar. Empoleon is not much better either.
>But Emboar iss fat
A pig that is FAT? Well color me surprised.

Also if you expect dragons coming from starters, especialy after charizard, you only have yourself to blame for your dissapointment

And Samurott is awesome, get rekt Dewott fags

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches