>>13804234And you recited the definition because...?
We are both pretty clear on what it means. Nothing in that says shit about it being evil or good. Just says what it is.
>Revenge CAN be evil but the act of taking revenge is not simply "bad" unless you're a pacifist.The entire concept of Good vs. Evil is entirely based on point of view. If you have a move called Payback, which is a synonym for Revenge as a Dark move, and have Revenge as a Fighting move, then it clearly shows that their intents on the subject aren't defining good vs. evil.
Also, let's remind ourselves, this is Pokemon.. the game with the sappiest, most simplistic world-view of good vs. evil out there.
>GuillotineI don't know why you'd bring that up. It contradicts your own point, not mine.
>... I didn't say all sneaky moves are dark typed, just that dark type moves have a sneaky underhanded them around them.So doesn't that make the entire fucking point of it moot then?
What makes more sense? That some moves are arbitrarily Dark and not? Or
>>13804055 ?
Protip: One choice isn't contradicted a million times.
