>>13817707I hate it when people butt in to conversations without actually following them. Since you can't follow a thread yourself, here you go:
>>13816539A makes a post expressing his enthusiasm for a cartoon character's alleged "decent tits."
>>13817345I mock him and insinuate that he is a child (because only someone with the mental maturity of a child would assert what he did), capping it off with the implication that, as a child, he must have homework to do.
>>13817375A responds by linking me to
>>13817126 , which is somehow supposed to be a retort. The only thing that possibly relates to anything I said was that A "just got home from a job," apparently meant to suggest he's not a student.
>>13817548I asserted that his "proof" he's not a student doesn't prove that at all, and in fact lends more credence to the contrary. Notice that here, nor at any other point, did I say anything about him making the image or Japanese.
>>13817588Someone who doesn't have the capacity to follow conversations starts asking me about the Japanese/image-making angles I never mentioned.
>>13817683I bring this to their attention.
>>13817707You ask why I said what I said.
And here we are. All caught up, sport?
