To clear this up.
>>13888362 said he wanted to make a dino team, wich would mean that it was filled with pokes based on dinosaurs.Then
>>13888386 said that dinosaurs aren't reptiles, wich spawned a great debate.
Now what we have here is a problem that is based around Phylogenetic nomenclature. Or rather the lack of it. You see, words like fish, reptile and amphibian are non-cladistic in that they don't actually include all the animals that are related into them. If they did then birds would count as dinosaurs, who would count as reptiles, who would count as amphibians wich would then count as fish. The whole problem with this discussion is that it's debating about an outdated term wich is only sticking around out of convinience.
Though includeing Aerodactyl on a dino team is still fucking stupid. 
