>>13963951Unless there's some secret site with a million people, I'm certain I've seen a majority of the people that post those things are either fat and unattractive or miserable. I mean YOU could be neither of the above things but still doesn't change what a majority of people are. I don't really see what you're trying to prove anymore.
Also I'm pretty sure that it's okay to base an assumption and a theory on what you've observed.
I know that not all of them are fat and whatever so why keep arguing? I don't understand where all of this defensiveness comes from unless I'm offending you??
>>13963963The types of people I'm talking about could be good people or bad people, but the point I'm making is that generally the people associated with the labels "furry" "pokephilia" "bara" "poke(boy)girl" etc. are overweight, unattractive, or miserable.
>>13964024that isn't me
