>>13972335That would be good- if it were a website for some charity organization or a virtual pamphlet.
Are you kidding? This is the "grannys first website" template all modern sites come packed with.
It still has massive useless sides of
NOTHING, if you're going to have HUGE SQUARES FOR ARTICLES MOST PEOPLE BROWSING THE SITE HAVE ALREADY READ put them in those sides or make them fucking not the size of skyscrapers, the latest news articles- the MAIN CONTENT OF THE SITE -are still not the focal point nor the eye catcher with useless things taking up a third of its space, they still lack any sense in how to make instantly accessible while remaining aesthetically pleasing site navigation without using drop down lists even going so far as to put drop down lists INSIDE DROP DOWN LISTS and everything is fucking inanely massive dear fucking god.
In fact this whole site just screams "I copied the first template I saw" which is a given since this layout is on every fucking backwater site and it hurts my brain when a larger one copies it, even the aesthetic is as lifeless and uninspired as its design. The author of this site had better be happy he jumped on the wagon in 2004 otherwise hardly anyone would browse his shitty site.
God I hate modern designs so fucking much.
News sites in particular act like they're chickens with their heads cut off in terms of design.
That forum is pretty decent though. The aesthetic and color contrast needs work but it's pretty ok.
