/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #14069980

[35 / 3 / ?]

60KiB, 554x527, 1377772238453.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:38:06 No.14069980 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14070032 >>14070069 >>14071221

>He also mentioned that XY only introduce around 70 new Pokémon.
>only 70 new Pokemon
FUCK

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:38:42 No.14070000 Report

Quoted By: >>14070084 >>14070090 >>14070183

Oh, and for all you fairyfags, that means those weak mons on site and their evos is all the fairies you'll get. And they'll all be completely out of league with the dragons up in OU. Enjoy your repeat of Gen 1 bug-types :^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:39:37 No.14070023 Report

Quoted By:

>what's a catalog?
>lololol nu thrdd XD

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:39:58 No.14070032 Report

Quoted By: >>14070185 >>14070386

>>14069980
That wasn't the same guy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:41:38 No.14070069 Report

Quoted By: >>14070185 >>14070386

>>14069980
Those were different people

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:42:04 No.14070084 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070000
Quads don't lie. Fairies confirmed for useless.

:^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:42:08 No.14070086 Report

Quoted By:

>some guy on /vp/ posted this
>THERE WAS SO MUCH TEXT
NO ES FAKE

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:42:17 No.14070090 Report

Quoted By: >>14070141

>>14070000
You know many of the old ones are going to be retype to fairy, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:44:31 No.14070141 Report

Quoted By: >>14070200

>>14070090
...aaaand they're also shit. What do we have, Clefable? Granbull?

Maybe Togekiss and Mismagius would be half-viable, but remember this is GF we're talking about. They're probably going to gimp their overhyped new type some way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:46:03 No.14070183 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070000
Quads confirmed for truth

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:46:08 No.14070185 Report

Quoted By: >>14070974

>>14070032
>>14070069
So, the text is fake but the images are real, or something?

I'm still picking Froakie anyway, so don't really care

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:46:54 No.14070200 Report

Quoted By: >>14070299

>>14070141
Milotic, Celebi, Blissey, Jirachi, Victini.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:50:42 No.14070299 Report

Quoted By: >>14070346 >>14070789

>>14070200
They're not going to change existing dual types. Rotom was only justified because they're alternate forms and it's possessing a microwave or someshit, but I doubt they'll permanently change up a type.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:52:05 No.14070346 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070299
They will. Fairy fit more than Psychic to them.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1379732337959.gif, 2MiB, 357x238

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:53:10 No.14070382 Report

Quoted By:

Preorder fucking cancelled.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 21:53:17 No.14070386 Report

Quoted By: >>14070612

>>14070069
>>14070032
Thank Jebus
I even like the 'leaked' Pokes but 70 new guys isn't enough to get my fix

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:00:54 No.14070612 Report

Quoted By: >>14070698 >>14070770

>>14070386
Uh, the 70 new guys guy is real. You guys have it the wrong way around.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:04:18 No.14070698 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070612
Why do you think it's real?
Not arguing I wasn't here and actually want to know

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:06:37 No.14070758 Report

Quoted By:

I work for gamefreak.
There are only 50 new pokemon.
Sorry guys

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:07:00 No.14070770 Report

Quoted By: >>14070793

>>14070612
>text with nothing to back it up its claims
>more legitimate than screenshots

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:07:48 No.14070789 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070299
The only time types were changed due to introduction of a new type was in Gen II. Magnemite was the only Gen I Pokemon who it made sense to change the type of

We don't have a pattern yet to say whether or not they would change dual types

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:08:07 No.14070793 Report

Quoted By: >>14070927

>>14070770
>fake-ass screenshots
>three threads on the front page proving they're fake-ass shit
>more legitimate than text

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:13:10 No.14070927 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070793
>There are only 50 new pokemon
>The Z legend is a snake completely made out of cocks
>After the credits Sycamore bends you over a table and makes you his bitch

By your logic what I just said is completely true even though I have nothing to back it up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:14:58 No.14070974 Report

Quoted By: >>14071020 >>14071136

>>14070185
The text was proven fake, but we don't know whether the pictures are fake or not
they look too real to be fake

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:17:04 No.14071020 Report

Quoted By: >>14071136 >>14072296

>>14070974
>The text was proven fake
No it wasn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:21:46 No.14071136 Report

Quoted By:

>>14070974
>>14071020
Why is everyone saying conflicting shit with no proof
I've been gone for several days I just want some goddamn answers

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1375994912292.jpg, 22KiB, 189x208

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:25:08 No.14071221 Report

Quoted By: >>14074894

>>14069980
>>only 70 new Pokemon
Oh goddamn I'd be so pissed about this if it was real

I mean johto and sinnoh at LEAST broke 100 and those were the fucking worst ones. What the fuck?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 22:33:51 No.14071422 Report

Quoted By:

Where is this info even coming from?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 23:08:07 No.14072296 Report

Quoted By: >>14073156 >>14074881

>>14071020
Yes it was, Hiro confirmed it was fake

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Sep 2013 23:51:59 No.14073156 Report

Quoted By:

>>14072296
>Hiro confirmed it was fake
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Sep 2013 01:07:47 No.14074692 Report

Quoted By:

If there is only 70 I will post very angrily for 3-5 days on /vp/ and claim I'll never buy another pokemon game before doing a 180 and defending the lack of pokemon with every ounce of autism I can muster and continue to buy all pokemon merchandise my poor ass can afford.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Sep 2013 01:18:16 No.14074881 Report

Quoted By:

>>14072296

Lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Sep 2013 01:18:48 No.14074894 Report

Quoted By: >>14074965

>>14071221
>sinnoh
>bad
confirmed for pleb

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Sep 2013 01:21:45 No.14074944 Report

Quoted By:

>70 new mons for Gen VI
>No Gen has ever had less than 100 new mons so far

Finding this a little hard to believe m8.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Sep 2013 01:22:52 No.14074965 Report

Quoted By:

>>14074894
Not bad, just the worst overall.
By comparison.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches