>>14105428>2 is a BIG one and that's because we haven't played the games yet and haven't gotten our eyes use to the art style yet. Sprites were based directly on the official art in a 2D manner so you could look at most fakes and many would comment on how it looks wrong/ not in style with the game. 3D models are different, they're a level removed from what we're use to so fakers can hide behind that to.No, it's way easier to tell a fake 3D model from a real one. It was easier for fakers to work with sprites. Literally the only fake that had a convincing model was that minx Pokemon last week.
>Simply, is the image blurry/ hard to read for no fucking reason? Some of these were taken with a webcam, and even then you can see the text on the Greninja images perfectly fine.
>Does it look like the classic tried-and-proven 3/4 battle stance that past fakers used even though we have confirmed modes that allow for you to move around the Pokemon?No, see Quilladin image
>Does the Pokemon only show up in one image and one post even though they're fucking 3D animated models now?No, see the three different Hawlucha images.
>Does the Pokemon look like something a modeler could shit out with lil effort (like this hawkman thing)?Hardly good criteria, considering most Pokemon are fairly simple looking.
Again, nothing is wrong with these images and they're the most convincing I've seen yet.
