>>14196220Figuring out the basis for a pokemon is speculation anyway.
When you look at a bird with a mask-like face and a scent theme, the only real conclusion you can draw is plague doctor. Or flamingo from the fact it's pink, but that still leaves the scent motif unaddressed (and a basis on both was a very real possibility).
How are "valid points" any different from evidence in the first place? What would constitute evidence for you? Please, give an example.
>You can cling to the hope it will magic it's self up into what you want but it's still a long short at this point.No shit. The speculation was something from when Spritzee was revealed, not this obese abomination.
Also, if you plan on posting on 4chan beyond today, please learn to quote properly.
