/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #14282328

[103 / 10 / ?]

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:00:06 No.14282328 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14282360 >>14282394 >>14282399 >>14282412 >>14282459 >>14282471 >>14282492 >>14282513 >>14282821 >>14282854 >>14283185 >>14283479 >>14284082 >>14284274

>People complaining about only 70 Pokemon
>mfw EVERY generation is pretty much just 70 decent Pokemon with a whole bunch of filler Pokemon
prove me wrong faggot
Pokemon X/Ys dex is literally just like every other gens dex minus the useless filler Pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:01:05 No.14282360 Report

Quoted By: >>14282407

>>14282328
define "filler pokemon"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:02:04 No.14282394 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328

At least 20 of the new Pokemon are filler.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:02:08 No.14282399 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
define "decent pokemon"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:02:16 No.14282407 Report

Quoted By: >>14282486 >>14282503 >>14282547

>>14282360
All the useless Pokemon every generation has
like that raccoon from Gen III, or Majikarp

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:02:21 No.14282412 Report

Quoted By: >>14282520 >>14282641

>>14282328
>klefki
yeah no filler pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:03:16 No.14282440 Report

Quoted By:

lmao, literally 40 pokemon are clefairy tier shits

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:03:50 No.14282459 Report

Quoted By: >>14282826

>>14282328

>every gen has filler shit pokemon

>gen 6 has less pokemon which means less good pokemon as well

Your turn faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:04:06 No.14282471 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
>whatever Pokemon that isn't part of an evolutionary family, or an uber, is a filler Pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:04:31 No.14282485 Report

Quoted By: >>14282540

At this point there are so many pokemon it really doesn't bother me.

What I was mostly concerned about with this Gen was the variety of older Pokemon available pre E4.

This game does not dissapoint in that regard. There is apparently a huge variety of Pokemon as you go along (70 seen before the 2nd gym according to one leaker) and there are plenty I haven't used before.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:04:38 No.14282486 Report

Quoted By: >>14282631

>>14282407
Zigzagoon it's not a filler, he's a bro

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:04:49 No.14282492 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
>implying shit like carbink, that iceberg poke, vivillion and the keys are not filler useless pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:05:00 No.14282503 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282407
I like both of those pokemon. They're not filler to me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:05:12 No.14282513 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
>implying 95% of gen 6 isn't useless filler pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:05:29 No.14282520 Report

Quoted By: >>14282551

>>14282412
imho it actually looks pretty badass

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:05:56 No.14282540 Report

Quoted By: >>14282643

>>14282485
What?There are only 69 as of the post-game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:06:06 No.14282547 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282407
>Magikarp
>filler
huh?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:06:15 No.14282551 Report

Quoted By: >>14282583

>>14282520
it's useless though

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:06:41 No.14282561 Report

Quoted By:

It doesn't matter if they're filler. I'd rather run into a new thing i've never seen before that's probably shit than rattata...again.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1327480036763.png, 215KiB, 392x411

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:07:09 No.14282583 Report

Quoted By: >>14282609

>>14282551
we don't know that yet though

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:07:29 No.14282600 Report

Quoted By:

You're implying XY have no bad designs
They do
Low amount of Pokemon is a valid complaint, despite the shitposting on either side.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:07:43 No.14282604 Report

Quoted By:

That would be true if they went for quality over quantity this time. But they didn't, and it looks like a dex missing 30 good Pokemon and we got stuck with the filler.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:07:49 No.14282607 Report

Quoted By: >>14282678 >>14282709

Here's how I view the situation

Reasonable tier:
-Those who acknowledge the meager number of pokemon and wish Game Freak could have put more time and effort in

Slightly overreactive but understandable tier:
-Those who won't buy the game because of this fact

Misguided tier:
-Those who try to deflect criticism by highlighting other features instead of rightfully acknowledging how a smaller number of new pokemon is disappointing to a lot of people

Wrong tier:
-Those who try to distort the numbers by citing mega evos as new pokemon/subsequent-gen evos as not new pokemon/prevos as not new pokemon

Batshit tier:
-bbbbut maybe there are a bunch of secret evolutions we don't know about! m-m-maybe game freak will release free DLC that gives us 50 more pokemon! GOTY!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:07:51 No.14282609 Report

Quoted By: >>14282858

>>14282583
it's pretty obvious

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:08:37 No.14282631 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282486
>implying most trainers didn't just catch him on route 2 and just let them sit in their box their whole life
>implying it's only purpose wasn't just to occupy the route and help you train

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:08:49 No.14282641 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282412
It was used in the elite 4, for a single stage pokemon it might have nice stats.
And a unique typing in the kalos region.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:08:53 No.14282643 Report

Quoted By: >>14282732

>>14282540
New pokemon, yes.

Have you seen the leaks? It's not like Black and White where it's only that particular gen's pokemon available pre E4.

There are a HUGE variety of older gen pokemon available in this game. So much so that they had to split the dex into 3 different regions.

When I said 70 different pokemon before the 2nd gym, it includes older pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:09:15 No.14282656 Report

Quoted By:

How many mega evloutions are going to be?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:10:03 No.14282678 Report

Quoted By: >>14282753

>>14282607

anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable and wrong.
nice job, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:10:54 No.14282709 Report

Quoted By: >>14282770 >>14282781 >>14282884

>>14282607
>Slightly overreactive but understandable tier:
>-Those who won't buy the game because of this fact
>understandable
It's understandable to let /vp/ make your decisions for you/for you to be such an autistic fuck that you'll not get the game because of nothing?
Why are you projecting?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:11:24 No.14282732 Report

Quoted By: >>14282851 >>14282889 >>14282946

>>14282643
Oooooh booy i sure am excited to catch another zubat. And who can forget about caterpie.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1360295080561.jpg, 10KiB, 188x200

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:11:48 No.14282753 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282678
samefag plz.....

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:12:22 No.14282770 Report

Quoted By: >>14283161

>>14282709
>because of nothing?
People value things on different levels than you. For some people new pokemon are a deal breaker. This shouldn't be hard to understand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:12:30 No.14282781 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282709
>/vp/ making decisions for you

No, it's the disappointment of a tepid selection compelling one to ignore the first iterations and wait for the third.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:13:38 No.14282821 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
I like variety, also, especially in Black and White, Pokemon I didn't initially like really grew on me.
For this reason i'm disappointed with the amount of pokemon in this version. There were enough pokemon that I could play through again and not get bored, I feel restricted in this one, also there was the challenge of finding that one pokemon in a habitat over others whereas now Im going to have to sift through other gens of pokemon to find that 70.

I still have the Vanillish line though, wtf they could have done it so much better

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:13:43 No.14282826 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282459
I agree with you, anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:14:29 No.14282851 Report

Quoted By: >>14282905 >>14282926

>>14282732
Bitch you can catch Bagon AND Gible before you even get that far in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:14:30 No.14282853 Report

Quoted By:

Except this gen is literally just the filler pokemon and none of the meat.

We have the fucking useless bug/flying butterfly.
The useless rodent. The useless 30 2 stage families.
The stand alone gimmick retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:14:30 No.14282854 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
So now we have even less decent pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:14:41 No.14282858 Report

Quoted By: >>14282933

>>14282609
Steel/Fairy + Prankster + Good Support Movepool = OU(?)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:14:48 No.14282862 Report

Quoted By: >>14282901 >>14282953

Anybody who says they won't buy the game anymore is lying.

They are all going to rush to gamestop or something the second they can and play the game for like 12 hours straight, they are just expressing their disappointment the only way they know how.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:15:34 No.14282884 Report

Quoted By: >>14282950

>>14282709
How is pokemon a nothing aspect of a pokemon game?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:15:53 No.14282889 Report

Quoted By: >>14282933

>>14282732
You're just being unreasonable or just trolling. 70 different Pokemon before the 2nd gym is pretty fucking amazing.

If you have no interest in older Pokemon than I don't understand how you enjoy these games in the first place.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1360302070937.jpg, 13KiB, 256x220

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:16:07 No.14282901 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282862
autistic people find it very difficult to express their feelings
so this would explain a lot of things

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:16:09 No.14282905 Report

Quoted By: >>14282964

>>14282851
Ooh boy i'm so excited to use that pokemon that I used 10 years ago...no sorry i just can't get hyped for that. It's ok if you can though. Enjoy the game

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:16:56 No.14282926 Report

Quoted By: >>14283120

>>14282851
Bagon is Y exclusive and Gible is X exclusive.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:17:20 No.14282933 Report

Quoted By: >>14282992

>>14282858
It had the stats of a rattata
>>14282889
I can just play one of the older games if I wanted to use the old pokemon.
What's the point of paying more money to do something I can already do?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:17:39 No.14282946 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282732
Hey! You can catch Heracross pre-E4 just like you could in G/S/C and R/S/E and D/P/Pl and HG/SS and B2/W2! GF was so awesome to put Heracross in for us instead of a new bug pokemon!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:17:48 No.14282949 Report

Quoted By:

Only about 45 or 50 are good and the other 20-25 are filler. These aren't any more quality pokemon than usual. I do respect the low count on legendaries this gen though.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1349855662592.jpg, 162KiB, 620x807

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:17:49 No.14282950 Report

Quoted By: >>14283023 >>14283037 >>14283201

>>14282884
Because we already have 700 fucking Pokemon dude
It's a non-issue now wither or not we have more, it's hard enough to "catch em all" as it is

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:17:59 No.14282953 Report

Quoted By: >>14283026

>>14282862
I ordered it from Amazon and will play it when I get around to it. If they repeat these errors I wont by the next. Every series gets a misstep, I'm not going to abandon them because of one bad generation, but I'm also not going to bite my tongue because my opinion offends you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:18:10 No.14282964 Report

Quoted By: >>14283362

>>14282905
But Gible isn't 10 years old.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:19:10 No.14282992 Report

Quoted By: >>14283104 >>14283232

>>14282933
So you're only interested in older Pokemon in each gen and have no interest in using your old bros in 3D.

You sound old. Do you even enjoy playing Pokemon?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:20:00 No.14283023 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282950
>>14282950
THIS
I even remember people complaining that WE HAD TOO MUCH POKEMON!
Now we are complaining that we don't have enough?!?!?
700 is more than enough, GF just needs to focus more on the gameplay/region now, we don't need any more Pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:20:06 No.14283026 Report

Quoted By: >>14283104 >>14283110 >>14283190

>>14282953
Name one misstep besides the amount of pokemon. Also if you didn't expect this out of an even gen and still think an the next gen (an odd gen) will pull the same shit it proves how much you know.

Face it, even gens are a lot crappier than odd gens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:20:17 No.14283037 Report

Quoted By: >>14283128 >>14283169 >>14283325

>>14282950
That was never the point of the games though. That was just the tag line of the anime. What a horrible arguement

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:21:46 No.14283104 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282992
Not him, but I don't find any appeal in using old things over again. I enjoy playing pokemon for the new pokemon.
>>14283026
The designs are pretty bad this time, and the amount of pokemon is a huge misstep. When you buy the games for new pokemon especially. I did expect less pokemon, but I wanted it to be at or near gen 2 level at the least. Odd gens USUALLY have more pokemon, but no gen ever had less than 100 pokemon anymore, so I don't know if I can trust gamefreak on that front anymore. We'll see.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:22:03 No.14283110 Report

Quoted By: >>14283157

>>14283026
Mega-evolutions that either hardly do anything or make something stupidly OP

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:22:16 No.14283120 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282926
Is this confirmed? What's the source of this? Because I'm getting X but I was thinking about using Salamence.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1331881632925.png, 7KiB, 231x219

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:22:30 No.14283128 Report

Quoted By: >>14283358

>>14283037
If that was never the point of the games, why are we complaining that we don't have enough Pokemon in the first place?
You seem pretty unreasonable dude

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:23:35 No.14283157 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283110
Mechanics-wise, mega evolutions are literally just normal evolutions that lose an item space. It doesn't even take up a turn to go mega.

At least we aren't getting a fuck ton of useless pre-evos.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:23:42 No.14283161 Report

Quoted By: >>14283207

>>14282770
I'm actually one of the people who only really gets Pokemon for the new mons they introduce, but there's just so much possible improvement gameplay-wise I'm still gonna get it

The way I see it:

Mon-Wise: This is probably one of worst, if not THE worst, gens

Game-wise: This is looking to be one of the best Pokemon games ever

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Pokémon_box_art_-_Red_Version.jpg, 90KiB, 270x270

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:23:52 No.14283169 Report

Quoted By: >>14283234 >>14283826

>>14283037
>that was never the point of the games though

I hope mods ban this guy for being underage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:24:25 No.14283185 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
>mfw EVERY generation is pretty much just 70 decent Pokemon with a whole bunch of filler Pokemon

As opposed to this generation, which still has a bunch of shitty filler even though its only got 70 new Pokemon?

You might have had a point if all 70 were actually good, but since they aren't you just look retarded.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1377033142690.jpg, 36KiB, 680x645

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:24:29 No.14283190 Report

Quoted By: >>14283223

>>14283026
Bullshit
There is no way in fuck you aren't underageb&
Gen 3 was shit
Gen 4 was awesome
Gen 1 was shit (don't pretend like it wasn't)
Gen 2 was awesome
Pokemon hasn't gotten shittier with every gen, it just gradually changed direction every gen

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:24:47 No.14283201 Report

Quoted By: >>14283234

>>14282950
The draw point of this series sure as hell isn't the gameplay. Every other monster catching game beats it out the ass in mechanics.
The saving grace of the series are the designs. No point in playing the new gen for gameplay, consider the only gameplay changes are more gimmicky shit like sky battles and amie which are going to be forgotten like the VS seeker next gen

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:24:54 No.14283207 Report

Quoted By: >>14283569

>>14283161
I don't play competitive, so it's all glitter and makeup to me.I'm mainly getting it because I need to recatch all the old pokemon due to losing White 2 somehow.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:25:35 No.14283223 Report

Quoted By: >>14283271

>>14283190
>Pokemon hasn't gotten shittier with every gen, it just gradually changed direction every gen
If you really think I implied that you must be underageb&

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:25:50 No.14283232 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282992
I love pokemon. Which is why I want more to use, not the same ones.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:25:57 No.14283234 Report

Quoted By: >>14283294

>>14283201
see:
>>14283169
Leave you underage fuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:27:10 No.14283271 Report

Quoted By: >>14283344 >>14283513

>>14283223
Gen 1 and Gen 3 were both shit
Only an underageb& who has never really played either would say otherwise
Deal with it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:27:59 No.14283294 Report

Quoted By: >>14283349

>>14283234
Wow, you sure blew me away with that argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:28:56 No.14283325 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283037
>get sent on a journey to complete the Pokedex by catching all Pokemon
>catching all Pokemon was never the point
Are you fucking serious?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:29:26 No.14283344 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283271
Then I don't see why you are equating the amount of pokemon and the quality of the games.

This argument was never about the quality of the actual games, it was about the amount of pokemon. If anyone deserves an underageb& it's you for not being able to read and jumping to silly conclusions based on things I never even implied.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1329710522388.jpg, 42KiB, 425x506

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:29:36 No.14283349 Report

Quoted By: >>14283433 >>14283691

>>14283294
>That wasn't the point of the games
>Shows him an image wof Pokemon Red which clearly proves that was the whole point
>"Wow, great argument!"
Don't you have school in the morning?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:30:03 No.14283358 Report

Quoted By: >>14283408

>>14283128
None of the complaints are that it's too easy to catch all 718 pokemon. Most complaints are that there are less new pokemon to play and experiment with compared to previous generations. It's completely reasonable to expect a number in the range of 100 new pokemons for the gen (if not more because it's the switch to a new console).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:30:12 No.14283362 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282964
>gen 4 was 12 years ago

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:31:30 No.14283408 Report

Quoted By: >>14283467 >>14283499

>>14283358
>. It's completely reasonable to expect a number in the range of 100 new pokemons for the gen
No, it's not
It seems pretty unreasonable to expect much more at this point imho

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:32:04 No.14283433 Report

Quoted By: >>14283552

>>14283349
Except I never made my argument. My argument was that having more pokemon to catch isn't a bad thing.

You for some reason hate pokemon so much you despise seeing new ones.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:32:10 No.14283440 Report

Quoted By:

>wanting more than 70 Pokemon

It's as if you guys want more shitty Pokemon like a gumball machine or a cardboard box.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:32:49 No.14283467 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283408
>get 100 new pokemon every game

IT'S UNREASONABLE FOR YOU TO EXPECT THE SAME THING YOU'VE BEEN GETTING FOR 15 YEARS. JESUS CHRIST THESE PEOPLE ARE SO ENTITLED

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:33:04 No.14283479 Report

Quoted By: >>14283628

>>14282328
Except most of those 70 pokémon are shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:33:51 No.14283499 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283408
How the fuck is it unreasonable when every other installment has added more?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:34:15 No.14283513 Report

Quoted By: >>14283532

>>14283271
>yfw the same people raging about the 70 pokemon, are the same people who prefer even gens.
Make up your minds, people.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:34:57 No.14283532 Report

Quoted By: >>14283565

>>14283513
Nope. I hate only 70 and my favorites are odds.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1377038053624.png, 51KiB, 400x400

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:35:50 No.14283552 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283433
how did the argument switch itself?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:36:09 No.14283565 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283532
Then you have a reason to hate them...

Do you not get the point of that post or something?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:36:22 No.14283569 Report

Quoted By: >>14283618

>>14283207
Oh I didn't mean game-wise as in competitive. I meant it based on the region, new mechanics, visuals, etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:38:02 No.14283618 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283569
Visuals are pretty much my last concern with games, I'm way too old to have really picked them up as a 'game-maker' element. The new mechanics are mini-game level stuff or 'technology!' things that are nice to have but not a big deal for me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:38:13 No.14283628 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283479
I want some of what you've been smoking m8

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:40:16 No.14283691 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283349
That wasn't me. To clarify, I thought only the anime used that slogan. Clearly, I'm an idiot today, so I recant my argument.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:43:20 No.14283811 Report

Quoted By:

Let me see,
another shitty looking pure ice DEFENSIVE SLOW pokemon. Wow so new
30 different something/normals
Another bug/flying
useless rodent
useless grass two stager
tiny amount of new moves
new type is lackluster in both quality and quantity
some useless gimmick single stagers
another dragon pseudo
another useless slow bear pokemon

Wow so good gen.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:43:47 No.14283826 Report

Quoted By:

>>14283169
You're right. I'm sorry for believing that the reason people played the game was to train and battle pokemon and defeat gym leaders and the E4, not falling for some marketing gimmick

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:48:48 No.14283998 Report

Quoted By: >>14284041 >>14284148

>yfw people will be missing out on the pokemon game with the most critical acclaim because it doesn't have enough new pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:50:13 No.14284041 Report

Quoted By: >>14284100

>>14283998
>people are going to play the pokemon game without pokemon
Oh wow

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:51:42 No.14284082 Report

Quoted By: >>14284105 >>14284137

>>14282328
>People complaining about only 70 Pokemon
>mfw EVERY generation is pretty much just 70 decent Pokemon with a whole bunch of filler Pokemon

so this gen we get 70 pokemon
of which, probably 15 will be decent looking

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:52:25 No.14284100 Report

Quoted By:

>>14284041
>with 30% less pokemon
Fixed it for you. It's far from "without pokemon".

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:52:33 No.14284105 Report

Quoted By:

>>14284082
Who defines filler pokemon? My taste in pokemon is not yours.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:53:33 No.14284137 Report

Quoted By:

>>14284082
Calling any pokemon filler makes you a damn faggot. People don't have the same taste as you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:53:48 No.14284148 Report

Quoted By: >>14284173

>>14283998
>implying a 7 isn't your average run of the mill game and that it is actual tough to get 8+

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:54:51 No.14284173 Report

Quoted By: >>14284223

>>14284148
I said POKEMON GAME with the most critical acclaim, that means it's more acclaimed then the other POKEMON GAMES.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:56:33 No.14284223 Report

Quoted By:

>>14284173
Main games have been getting the same bloody score across the board since forever

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2013 05:58:26 No.14284274 Report

Quoted By:

>>14282328
>minus the useless filler Pokemon
>dedenne doesn't evolve
>two stagers fucking everywhere
>a slow defensive wall ICE pokemon
>only one new ground and poison line

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches