[24 / 2 / ?]
ITT: Some knowledge for you retards. The "ONLY 70 NEW POKEMON" posts seem to be disregarding the fact that this generation is almost exclusively new evolutionary, non-legendary lines. It's unfair to compare 70 with the previous gen's totals. Think about it this way - if you take away Xerneas, Yveltal, Zygarde, and Sylveon, we're left with 65 entirely new Pokemon. If you only count the new, non-legendary Pokemon lines of Generation 2 & 4, this generation's analogues, Gen 2 introduced 76 new Pokemon and Gen 4 only 69. Their number was hugely inflated by pre-evos, new evos and legendaries. (And this is just my opinion, but Gen 6 seems to have relatively few shitty gimmicky Pokemon like Chatot or Cherrim) For good measure, you can count mega evolutions as basically being new Pokemon, as they are functionally similar to the huge number of evos Gen 2 & 4 gave us. We know of 17 already, and there are likely many more undiscovered + even more released in events. And you know there's going to be a shit ton of event legendaries, so when it's all said and done, we'll easily be in the neighborhood of 100 effectively new Pokemon. tl;dr: SHUT THE FUCK UP
Anonymous
>>14296629 >For good measure, you can count mega evolutions as basically being new Pokemon We've been over this faggot. 18 megas and yet you can only use 1 to go mega with in any battle. Can't use Mega Charizard, Mega Mawile, and Mega Ampharos in the same battle so NO it does not count. No dex entry either meaning GF does not consider them as entirely new evolved forms. Not to mention they can't maintain it outside of battle and require a hold item to even achieve it at all times. They are a glorified form change gimmick made while neglecting actual new evolutions and new mons we could have gotten.
Besides the shitstorm that erupted from finding out about the 70 new mons proves many think like this. Once it releases I hope you enjoy trying to butt in on every thread trying to defend this piece of garbage.
tl;dr NO YOU'RE WRONG FUCK OFF
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>implying carbink and klefki aren't gimmicks
Anonymous
>>14296629 It is still a huge step back from gen 5. Fuck you and your gay shit
Anonymous
>>14296798 That's not a fair comparison at all. Had the concept existed then, the likes of Rhyperior, Tangrowth and Lickilicky would probably have been Megas.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14297219 the whole mega concept has been executed so badly.
i think megas should be reserved for stage 3 pokemon who can't evolve anymore - and even then, not for fuckers like garchomp.
it makes sense for charizard and ampharos, but guys like mawile and absol having megaevolutions is just shoehorning the feature into the game for the sake of it.
Anonymous
>>14296629 some people just can't
dig it, for others its
the Bane of their exsistance Anonymous
You know what, I look at Gen V admirably because it used all new pokemon for its region. No zubats, geodudes, and whatever else infesting the caves. No ratattas and pidgeys jumping out at the start of the game. I like that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14297576 It had a lot of paralles with the original 151. But damn if it wasn't a breath of fresh air. I now appreciate Gen V a hell of a lot more than i did before.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14297187 because they fucking made Gen 5 completely separate from the rest of its gens to have only its own pokemon. Otherwise it was stagnation.
Gen 6 is the transition to 3D, mega evolutions, fairy type, all these new features, PLUS some new pokemon.
Gen 6 is a break from creating so much new pokemon last gen, and is no worse than Gen 4. You're all spoiled as fuck though, so it doesn't matter.
Anonymous
>>14296629 >droning this hard Stop being a fucking apologist. 70 new pokemons is sad, pathetic and no fun.
And mega evos are not evos, else it would lasts when the battle is over. They purposely made them so they are not real evos and no one would prefer having mega evos over real evos.
If you don't like to hunt and catch new pokemons I don't know what the fuck you are doing here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14297494 epic, good sir :^)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What if... what if this generation is light on new pokemon because they're saving some for another game in 3 years (for the 20th anniversary)?
Anonymous
>>14297848 Sorry but I think all the shit Game Freak added to this Gen is far, far more important than having another 30-40 box cloggers. Do I want Mega Evolution or 20 more pieces of shit that I will catch and never touch again to fill up my dex? Mega Evolutions please. More pokes doesn't add ANYTHING of value to the game, if the next gen was nothing but giving old Pokes love and extra evos/mega evos and didn't have a single new pokemon I'd welcome it with open arms.
Anonymous
Try harder faggot..Gen 2 100 NEW Pokes..Gen3 135 NEW Pokes, Gen 4 107 NEW Pokes..and Gen 5 157..so fucking try harder..Idiot..
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14298353 >can't into reading comprehension Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14297848 >And mega evos are not evos, else it would lasts when the battle is over. They purposely made them so they are not real evos and no one would prefer having mega evos over real evos. Exactly..someone finally understand
Anonymous
People that shits on X and Y for stuff like this can have only two purposes. First, they just want to make people mad and they don't care about Pokemon by default; they most likely come here from /v/. Second, they are just people honestly pissed by the smallest thing and they don't want people to buy and support this game, hence they will call you "drone" or "shill". I am pretty sure that most of the people here are the latter ones. And honestly they make me laugh. They are now shitting this board with their complaints but it will be fun to see them getting even more mad when this game will sell millions of copies. No matter how much you cry, faggots, you won't stop people with real tastes from buying the game. I can not wait for your butthurt threads while everyone else will enjoy the game. And who are you trying to fool? You'll buy those games too anyway.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14298348 >Sorry but I think all the shit Game Freak added to this Gen is far, far more important like having a lot of fairy but none able to compete against dragons stat wise?
And the 3D is turning out to be not very good and is more an excuse than a feature now. But not having post game for a game making such an easy profit is a fucking shame.
Keep sucking.
Anonymous
>>14298518 >only 70 Pokemon >terrible type spreads >"smallest thing" Get fucked.
inb4
>muh 3d models >mud biggest region >muh pokemon riding >muh largest amount of catchable pokemon >muh dress up >muh minigames >muh benches >muh I don't even want new Pokemon >muh mega evolutions are exactly the same as new Pokemon even if they function nothing like new Pokemon The game isn't called 'Dress Up Bench Sitting Ride Around.' Its called Pokemon.
I want some more fucking Pokemon
Anonymous
I'd rather have 70 new ones and 3 legendaries than 100 new ones and 33 legendaries like they've done since gen III
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14301086 70 new pokemons is a shame but it would not have mattered if they did not fucked the type spreading that bad. Hell, even fairies are awful stat wise apparently
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14301219 But we'd have 8 more Pokemon if they did that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Blame the lack of new evos on Evolite. When it was introduced, Gamefreak essentially made a statement that pokemon who could not use it were final form.