/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #14397569

[35 / 4 / ?]

124KiB, 509x691, image.jpg

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:31:40 No.14397569 View View Reply Original Report

>hahaha only 70 new pokemon what a shitty gen.

There are still over 30 unrevealed pokedex entries. What lead everyone to think theres not more?
Recently GF also put alot of Legendarys BEHIND the Cover-Trios, so who said there won't be more Legendarys?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:33:17 No.14397594 Report

Quoted By: >>14397615

National Dex numbers say no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:34:00 No.14397608 Report

Quoted By:

yes i with you too if u havent figured out vp is fucking retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:34:15 No.14397615 Report

Quoted By: >>14397665 >>14397697

>>14397594
We only know the dex entries up to Zygarde though, don't we?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:37:05 No.14397665 Report

Quoted By: >>14398185

>>14397615
There may be a few legendaries after him but there's no more normal pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:38:24 No.14397690 Report

Quoted By:

>caring about legendaries

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:38:56 No.14397697 Report

Quoted By:

>>14397615
After him will just be event legendaries.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:40:28 No.14397724 Report

Quoted By: >>14397779 >>14397782 >>14397954 >>14398049 >>14398350

>>14397569
Even if there're only 70 new pokémon, there's an explanation in the plot.
Team Flare uses a massive laser canon fueled by pokémon souls. They once used it, a war started, a fuckload of pokémon died - only 70 species

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:41:31 No.14397743 Report

Quoted By:

>implying this gen will follow the classic dex number organization

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:42:59 No.14397779 Report

Quoted By: >>14397933

>>14397724

>B-b-but the story said...

Still doesn't justify a shitty 70 Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:43:03 No.14397782 Report

Quoted By:

>>14397724
I'm not against only having 70 new pkmn, I'm just confused as to why everyone is so set on that number. Of course, nationaldex is a pretty undeniable argument. Hadn't thought of that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:51:55 No.14397933 Report

Quoted By: >>14398126

>>14397779
>a fuckload of pokémon died
have you ever heard about species extinction?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:53:01 No.14397954 Report

Quoted By:

Guys, we have like 700+ pokemon, why on earth would you want more? I understand type diversity, but this series has to live for years to come and keep giving us things to look forward to, so it's understandable that we wouldn't get every type combination.

>>14397724
There are more pokemon living in Kalos than just the ones introduced in this generation. More than half of the national dex lives there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:56:19 No.14398011 Report

Quoted By:

There are only 70 pokemon, but only 3 of the new pokemon families are shit and the rest are all gold 10/10 would train.

So it works out.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1362066624331.png, 182KiB, 373x700

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:57:01 No.14398024 Report

Quoted By: >>14398049

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 13:58:08 No.14398049 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398024
meant for >>14397724

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:01:42 No.14398126 Report

Quoted By:

>>14397933
>extinction
>if even one Pokemon of the species survived then it would be able to make more of itself
>implying that isn't just a ploy to make GameFreak's laziness seem justified

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:02:52 No.14398143 Report

Quoted By: >>14398178

>>14397569
Who CARES about legendaries? Most of them are going to be event-exclusive anyways, so you'd have even less of a chance to put them into practical use.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:05:03 No.14398178 Report

Quoted By: >>14398239

>>14398143
I care about Legendarys.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:05:34 No.14398185 Report

Quoted By: >>14398216

>>14397665
Who says these legendaries won't include a Normal type?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:07:24 No.14398216 Report

Quoted By: >>14398266

>>14398185
>Legendary
>Normal type

R u 'avin a giggle m8?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:08:40 No.14398239 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398178
And? Are you supposed to change things based on your one opinion? Because you really aren't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:09:43 No.14398266 Report

Quoted By: >>14398291

>>14398216
>what is Meloetta and Arceus

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:11:57 No.14398291 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398266
nigga...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:15:02 No.14398350 Report

Quoted By: >>14398878

>>14397724
So they came up with a bullshit excuse later to make up for what they did.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:16:26 No.14398381 Report

Quoted By:

Nah mate.

~70 pokemon is fine by me. This game has a grip load of available poke to play around with. ~70 pokemon is fine, considering they bring the total amount of pokes to over 700. plus megas, plus new typings, plus updated charts, plus new moves

cant wait. Oh and as a side note, maybe if enough people begin to bitch, there will be dl pokes? Idk, I wouldnt really want that, but I know itll make some people shut up

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:17:24 No.14398396 Report

Quoted By: >>14398467 >>14398501 >>14398549

>wanting more legendaries
did gen iv teach us nothing?
get a trio, 2 mascots, 1 fairy-like legendary, and MAYBE a 3rd mascot. More than 7 "legendaries" is stupid as fuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:21:49 No.14398467 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398396
Well im used to having at least 5, because thats how it started, so im kinda weirded out by only having 3.
Not saying we need, or I want more, I'm just confused why everybody is so hard against the idea of more pkmn being possible.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 800px-Dunkleosteus_skull_steveoc.jpg, 66KiB, 800x557

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:23:49 No.14398501 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398396
More than 3 legends is stupid as fuck.

Trios blow and add nothing to the game.
Pixies blow and add nothing to the game.
You don't need anything more than the two box mascots and the third faggot for the Milking Edition 2 years later.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:26:40 No.14398539 Report

Quoted By:

I prefer having a lot of legendberries.

I never used any or even liked any besides maybe 3, but the more the merrier. Some people are bound to like them, and there is just that much more to do in game oh, and I do kinda like legend lore

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1348882506841.jpg, 55KiB, 500x373

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:27:31 No.14398549 Report

Quoted By: >>14398597 >>14398601

>>14398396
True, people bitching about no legendaries sound like the faggots who didn't grow up with Gen 1.

That gen had the best breakdown: Mewtwo + Trio. That's it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:31:15 No.14398597 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398549

You forgot Mew, it's event exclusive Legendary.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:31:27 No.14398601 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398549
>What is Mew

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:47:52 No.14398863 Report

Quoted By:

Not to sound like an idiot or slowpoke, but last I checked, the mountain dex and coastal dex were missing entries or pokemon. Nothing special or important, but noticed on the database.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Oct 2013 14:49:13 No.14398878 Report

Quoted By:

>>14398350
This.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches