>>14474217>Even though it is "edgy"Little known fact, the definition of "edgy" (as we use the word) isn't even agreed on and hasn't reached a common consensus at all. Too many people have too many different criteria for what fits an edgy Pokemon. This was tested and confirmed in a thread made on /vp/ a few months back.
Basically, there isn't a single buzzword on this board that is remotely clever or even remotely funny. Everything from "muh sides!" to "edgy" to "rekt" is spouted by retards, even if they're sometimes just trying to be ironic, and it's the quickest way to spot a drone trying to fit in with the board.
