>>14895583Not really. He, more or less, wants a beautiful world, a perfect world, which, at least according to him, can not be achieved with the world as it is. He doesn't want everything, but rather has a vision of what the world should be like, the problems with the world, what can and can't be done about it, and what needs to happen for his vision to be a reality.
Note that he actually did say, at one point, he tried the "peaceful route" and he failed, as the world if full of greedy assholes.
His views on such a thing aren't as black and white as one might expect, really. This could be argued forever (and has been), and there could still be no definite answer.
I do hope that most of us do realize that genocide is most likely /not/ the answer, as he reached, but his words are actually quite thought provoking.
Do you think he's right? Do you think he's wrong? Who really knows? Maybe he is completely wrong, maybe he's completely right. But these are things to think about, consider, and draw your own conclusions.
