people criticizing Pokemon designs is practically never constructive or using any actual knowledge of art or design. it's always just utter bullshit that boils down to "this perfectly fine design is not my cup of tea, but I can't just say that; I must explain how the design is illogical, cluttered and poorly drawn, because just having personal taste isn't enough".
what a sad state of affairs, grown-ass adults pretending to be knowledgeable about character design to tear apart a children's video game for e-penis points.
>>15541565the patterns resemble asian decorations AND fit the fire theme. the mix of yellow and red is very... fiery.
you guys say any Pokemon with decorative patterns is ~overdesigned~ as if real world animals don't often have the exact same shit for various reasons
by these standards, countless real-life animals are 'overdesigned anime bullshit'.
>>15541603except that your criticism is vague and substanceless
>None of its parts are functional, all of the "designs" or parts are fluff that do nothing. what does this even mean? I don't think you know either.
