[46 / 13 / ?]
Anyone think Pokemon would be better off without Game Freak? I mean just look at X&Y:
>horrible graphic, what is this a N64 game? I'll be generous and call it a Dreamcast game
>terrible story, no character development, and not just XY every main pokemon games too
>no voice acting, in 2013, with the money Pokemon make and the 3DS is more than capable of, this is inexcusable
>creative bankrupt or like people usually said running out of ideas, half of the Mega are just adding more spike, most of Kalos pokemon are bland as fuck, and not in a good way, save for a few ones. The fact that there's only 69, even counting the 3 event it still only 72, new pokemon in XY is proof enough.
They should have let Monolith Soft, Retro studios make Pokemon games or even Square Enix, Level-5, Bamco.
>horrible graphic, what is this a N64 game? I'll be generous and call it a Dreamcast game
>terrible story, no character development, and not just XY every main pokemon games too
>no voice acting, in 2013, with the money Pokemon make and the 3DS is more than capable of, this is inexcusable
>creative bankrupt or like people usually said running out of ideas, half of the Mega are just adding more spike, most of Kalos pokemon are bland as fuck, and not in a good way, save for a few ones. The fact that there's only 69, even counting the 3 event it still only 72, new pokemon in XY is proof enough.
They should have let Monolith Soft, Retro studios make Pokemon games or even Square Enix, Level-5, Bamco.
