>>16135689>It's not a primary issue in the majority of people that have it, in the sense that incontinence is typically the result of other problems.Such as physical injuries, sure. You sound like you're suggesting that incontinent people generally tend to be complete retards or invalids, though, which is a pretty wrong and ignorant assumption.
>Have you ever heard of someone with a stroke suddenly getting horny over having difficulty using one side of their body? Have you ever heard of adults laughing at or divorcing others for having to wear glasses? They learn to accept their incontinence, but since there are so many people who don't, they seek out people who are intelligent enough to appreciate their diapers.
>But then so's anybody with incontinence who's used multiple brands, or someone who's supported someone buying them. You say that as if hospitals and support workers don't tend to buy the cheapest crap that's available. Face it, with such a stigmatized item, people who aren't knowledgeable enough will go for things like discreteness, familiarity and prices over actual quality, since they don't know what's better. There are lots of incontinent people who are so afraid of leaks that they don't leave their house, all because they're not wearing proper diapers.
