>>16320131Except I'm not? I'm asking for an explanation and you know it. I've given you an opportunity to do so at every point. I would gladly like to hear one. All you've done is:
-come up with a meta example
>I asked for an in-universe example-Gender != Sex
>Only in a sociological contextAnd we looped, once or twice, and then I straight up asked for a simpler explanation that was non-meta, made sense, was in-context to the universe, and was simpler than genitals. It's that simple. And I'm the one with my ears closed? It really is impossible to debate on 4Chan.